How about BigDoubles and BigIntegers?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I don't think you can avoid that.
>
> I'd suggest making it CQL-only if we do doubles -- no backwards
> incompatibility required there.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jason wrote:
>> Sorry, I sho
+1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 16:03, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Alright, third time's not always the charm, my mistake. Let's try again.
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.8.1:
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8.1@r1139326
> Artifacts:
> h
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 16:03, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>> Alright, third time's not always the charm, my mistake. Let's try again.
>> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.8.1:
>>
>> SVN:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/
Asked on #asfinfra and was told the only things mirrored on git are trunk /
tags / branches .
git-svn it is.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 20 Jun 2011, at 16:28, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Maybe the non-standard
unsubscribe
