As 0.8 approaches final status in the next few weeks, I wondered about how
releases receive the label, "current stable". I don't know if there's any
precedent for this, but I thought it might be nice to do a separate vote when
new major releases are out and weigh heavily those in the community
It's not crazy, but the implementation would be a little involved (see
Brandon's comments to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1108).
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Chris Burroughs
wrote:
> I wanted to see if this was generally useful before I just made a ticket.
>
> The scenario
Back when I used to run postgresql, I saw the same cycle:
- most people don't bother testing until "stable" .0 is released
- consequently, most people don't deploy to production until .1 is released
I think moving the stable label would be futile since the majority
will just wait that much long
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Back when I used to run postgresql, I saw the same cycle:
>
> - most people don't bother testing until "stable" .0 is released
> - consequently, most people don't deploy to production until .1 is released
>
> I think moving the stable lab
+1 nonbinding
On Apr 22, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.5.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7@r1095960
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassand
+1
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.5.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7@r1095960
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-113/o
+1
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.5.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7@r1095960
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-113/o
Stephen
As part of the 0.6.1 thrift release the libthrift and libfb303 are now
available in the apache repo
(http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/thrift/). Can you reference these
jars rather than deploying a second set to the m2 repo in the cassandra deps
folder. I looked for a pom or ivy.
yep will be so doing, but those poms have issues, such as depending
transitively on a slf4j implementation
also ranges are non reproducable, so it will be a specific version
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a dire
Does this mean 0.6.1 isn't going to work for 0.8 maven deps?
I need to know because I'll upgrade the version in the source if we are
going to depend on it.
-Jake
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yep will be so doing, but those poms ha
No it means that the pom needs to have exclusions applied.
going forward the thrift pom should be fixed to not have a transitive
dep on the slf4j-log4j implementation... the whole point of slf4j is
that the ned user picks the impl and the libraries along the way just
dep on the api.
-Stephen
On
I gave myself a ticket for that and will remove the left over log4j dependency
- Jake
On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> No it means that the pom needs to have exclusions applied.
>
> going forward the thrift pom should be fixed to not have a transitive
> dep on the slf4j-lo
it's the slf4j-log4j dependency (which transitively pulls in log4j) that
should either be removed from thrift's pom or marked with scope provided.
best is to remove it.
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct res
13 matches
Mail list logo
