On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Nathan McCall wrote:
> FYI - I asked a similar question in #cassandra-dev yesterday (based on
> this message thread actually) and was directed to this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-754
Interesting, but it seems the objection is more on t
On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:24:40 +0200 gabriele renzi wrote:
gr> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Nathan McCall
wrote:
>> FYI - I asked a similar question in #cassandra-dev yesterday (based on
>> this message thread actually) and was directed to this issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C
Please Unsubscribe me from this list
2010/5/7 Ted Zlatanov
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:24:40 +0200 gabriele renzi
> wrote:
>
> gr> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Nathan McCall
> wrote:
> >> FYI - I asked a similar question in #cassandra-dev yesterday (based on
> >> this message thread actually) a
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mike Malone wrote:
>
> The upshot is, the Cassandra data model would go from being "it's a nested
> dictionary, just kidding no it's not!" to being "it's a nested dictionary,
> for serious." Again, these are all just ideas... but I think this
> simplified
> data m
... care to review the patch?
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Yes, this is a bug. Patch attached to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1056
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Anty wrote:
>> HI:All
>>
>> In source code of 0.6.1 ,in SSTableWriter,
>> privat
