Re: State of Materialized Views

It’s the only remaining one on my radar. But we should be good next week - so long as nothing else pops up, and I’m not missing any other JIRAs. — AY On 22 September 2017 at 19:18:12, Michael Shuler (mich...@pbandjelly.org) wrote: I asked the same question on IRC a couple days ago and Aleksey a

Re: State of Materialized Views

I asked the same question on IRC a couple days ago and Aleksey asked if I could hold for CASSANDRA-13595. -- Kind regards, Michael On 09/22/2017 01:02 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Just saw that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11500 got > commited 4 days ago, awesome stuff and a huge

Re: State of Materialized Views

Just saw that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11500 got commited 4 days ago, awesome stuff and a huge thank you to everyone who worked on it! Looking forward to what happens in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13826 :) I don't know if we are waiting on anything othe

Re: State of Materialized Views

Status of above is on our collective radars. As always, interleaving reviews with other work is a challenge. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Nate McCall wrote: > > > > We're working on the following MV-related issues in the 4.0 time-frame: > > CASSANDRA-13162 > > CASSANDRA-13547 > Patch

Re: State of Materialized Views

> > We're working on the following MV-related issues in the 4.0 time-frame: > CASSANDRA-13162 > CASSANDRA-13547 Patch Available > CASSANDRA-13127 Patch Available > CASSANDRA-13409 Patch Available > CASSANDRA-12952 Patch Available > CASSANDRA-13069 > CASSANDRA-12888 >

Re: State of Materialized Views

We have a couple of big deployments with MV in production, I will try to get some help in form of testing and validation. Will do my best to try and contribute to the codebase too. Regards, Carlos Juzarte Rolo Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP Pythian - Love y

Re: State of Materialized Views

> > Who is "we" in this case? Initial contributors (myself + Jake, Carl's no longer active on the project), Zhao, Andres, Paulo, Sylvain, etc. The people who are publicly, actively working on MV issues atm. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:46 AM, benjamin roth wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Who is "we" in thi

Re: State of Materialized Views

Hi Josh, Who is "we" in this case? Best, Ben 2017-07-24 15:41 GMT+02:00 Josh McKenzie : > > > > The initial contributors turned their back on MVs > > > We're working on the following MV-related issues in the 4.0 time-frame: > CASSANDRA-13162 > CASSANDRA-13547 > CASSANDRA-13127 >

Re: State of Materialized Views

> > The initial contributors turned their back on MVs We're working on the following MV-related issues in the 4.0 time-frame: CASSANDRA-13162 CASSANDRA-13547 CASSANDRA-13127 CASSANDRA-13409 CASSANDRA-12952 CASSANDRA-13069 CASSANDRA-12888 We're also keeping our eye on

Re: State of Materialized Views

I'm going to do my best to review all the changes Zhao is making under CASSANDRA-11500 , but yeah definitely need a committer nominee as well. On that note, Zhao is going to try address a lot of the current issues I listed above in #11500.​ Tha

Re: State of Materialized Views

> > so perhaps the real solution is we need to be more aggressive about > nominating and electing committers who are willing to spend some attention on > MVs. > I am very much +1 on this solution. Huge thanks to Kurt for the excellent summarization and to Benjamin and ZhaoYang for all their re

Re: State of Materialized Views

On 2017-07-16 21:22 (-0700), kurt greaves wrote: > wall of text inc. > *tl;dr: *Aiming to come to some conclusions about what we are doing with > MV's and how we are going to make them stable in production. But really > just trying to raise awareness/involvement for MV's. > I share your frust

Re: State of Materialized Views

Thanks for the input Benjamin. Sounds like you've come to a lot of the same conclusions I have. I'm certainly keen on fixing up MV's and I don't really see a way we could avoid it, as I know they are already widely being used in production. I think we would have had a much easier time if we went wi

Re: State of Materialized Views

Hi Kurt, First of all thanks for this elaborate post. At this moment, I don't want to come up with a solution for all MV issues but I would like to point out, why I was quite active some time ago and why I pulled myself back. As you also mentioned in different words, it seems to me that MVs are

State of Materialized Views

wall of text inc. *tl;dr: *Aiming to come to some conclusions about what we are doing with MV's and how we are going to make them stable in production. But really just trying to raise awareness/involvement for MV's. It seems we've got an excess of MV bugs that pretty much make them completely unus