Hi Sylvain,
On 04/25/2012 10:53 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Stephen Connolly
I'd be interested in seeing what reaction you get to this... I suggested it
a while back, but got nowhere
I think the discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-85
On 04/25/2012 10:14 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
b.) go a step back and don't version any jars in lib/ but automate the
retrieval of license files (would do this for you, if needed)
I'd be interested in seeing what reaction you get to this... I suggested
it a while back, but got nowhere
I ho
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
>> b.) go a step back and don't version any jars in lib/ but automate the
>> retrieval of license files (would do this for you, if needed)
>>
>
> I'd be interested in seeing what reaction you get to this... I suggested it
> a while back, bu
On 25 April 2012 09:00, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 25 April 2012 08:39, Matthias Pfau wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>> yesterday, we noticed that cassandra is currently published with
>> inconsistent dependencies. The inconsistencies exist between the published
>> pom and the published distribution (ta
On 25 April 2012 08:39, Matthias Pfau wrote:
> Hi there,
> yesterday, we noticed that cassandra is currently published with
> inconsistent dependencies. The inconsistencies exist between the published
> pom and the published distribution (tar.gz).
>
> This is a serious issue for us as we are usin
