How about BigDoubles and BigIntegers?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I don't think you can avoid that.
>
> I'd suggest making it CQL-only if we do doubles -- no backwards
> incompatibility required there.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jason wrote:
>> Sorry, I sho
I don't think you can avoid that.
I'd suggest making it CQL-only if we do doubles -- no backwards
incompatibility required there.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jason wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more clear; I was speaking to the question of how
> to avoid modifying the thrift interface
Sorry, I should have been more clear; I was speaking to the question of how to
avoid modifying the thrift interface.
- Jason
On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Joseph Stein wrote:
> hmmm, well Jason it is not as accurate as I would have thought at first and
> the increments on the long are whacked
hmmm, well Jason it is not as accurate as I would have thought at first and
the increments on the long are whacked (which now that I think about it more
makes sense since a +1 of the bits as long for the double would not
necessarly represent the +1 on the double).
So I am setting the increment to
I will give that a shot, seems that it will work fantastically, thanks!
I will keep trolling JIRA then for something I feel I can get my feet wet
with and contribute then.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Jason Fager wrote:
> Longs and Doubles are both 64-bit values and are pretty easily
> conv
Longs and Doubles are both 64-bit values and are pretty easily
convertible. Check out Double.doubleToLongBits and
Double.longBitsToDouble in the JDK; you can also read more about the
details of the conversion and get some pointers to some code in a post
I wrote last year:
http://jasonfager.com/770
can you estimate when this feature will be added?
JIRA ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2614
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Dave Rav wrote:
> can I use 'Colunm' and 'CounterColumn' in the same 'column family'?
No you cannot. As of 0.8.0 you have either counter column family or column
family without counters. But I'll
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Dave Rav wrote:
> can I use 'Colunm' and 'CounterColumn' in the same 'column family'?
No you cannot. As of 0.8.0 you have either counter column family or column
family without counters. But I'll admit that right off the bat I don't see any
technical blocker to do
