Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-18 Thread Josh McKenzie
A few thoughts: 1. If we gate the classification behind each test failure being root-caused, we consistently need people who are dedicating their time to doing that or we end up with a backlog of unclassified CI failures (like we have now and have always had historically). 2. Newcomers to the

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-18 Thread Brandon Williams
> I think a simple metric for "is something flaky" is "does it only fail once > in the butler history (of 15 or so builds)". Does that make it considered flaky? What if the one failure is a timeout? I think each failing case has to have the failures investigated in order to know. Kind Regards,

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-18 Thread Josh McKenzie
So move to beta when: 1. all non-flaky test *failures* (NOT tickets, see below) are resolved 2. We get a green ci-cassandra run Move to rc when: 1. Three consecutive green runs in ci-cassandra Release when: 1. All rc tickets are closed 2. Some time-based gate maybe? 3. Three more consecutive

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Berenguer Blasi
+1 to Mick's points. Also notice in circle 4.1 green runs are the norm lately imo. Yes it's not the official CI but it helps build an overall picture of improvement towards green CI. On jenkins, if you check the latest 4.1 runs, <5-ish failures per run are starting to be common and those that

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
+1, I second Mick on both points. On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 16:23, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > We're down from 13 tickets blocking 4.1 beta down to 7: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=484&quickFilter=2455. >> As mentioned above, we have some test failures w/out ticket

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Paulo Motta
Please disconsider previous message, I missed Ekaterina's message :) Em qua., 17 de ago. de 2022 às 17:35, Paulo Motta escreveu: > > testAutoSnapshotTTIOnDropAfterRestart has failed a few times so there's > some legit flake there: > https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-4.1/138/testRepor

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Paulo Motta
> testAutoSnapshotTTIOnDropAfterRestart has failed a few times so there's some legit flake there: https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-4.1/138/testReport/org.apache.cassandra.distributed.test/AutoSnapshotTtlTest/testAutoSnapshotTTlOnDropAfterRestart_2/. No build lead lately so we don't hav

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > We're down from 13 tickets blocking 4.1 beta down to 7: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=484&quickFilter=2455. > As mentioned above, we have some test failures w/out tickets so that 7 is > probably closer realistically to the previous count. > I suggest we mov

Re: Cassandra project status update 2022-08-17

2022-08-17 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
One correction, testAutoSnapshotTTIOnDropAfterRestart - ticket in review already, it wasn’t linked in Butler though. I will link it now. Thanks Paulo and Caleb for looking into it. On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 14:05, Josh McKenzie wrote: > This update comes to you from day 5 of quarantining in the bas