On 10/13/2011 2:35 PM, Nick Telford wrote:
The release vote is currently running, so, "any time now". I believe the
original target release date was October 8th; but that fell on a weekend and
it's been delayed by a couple of regressions.
Regards,
Nick Telford
On 13 October 2011 14:24, Iroiso
The release vote is currently running, so, "any time now". I believe the
original target release date was October 8th; but that fell on a weekend and
it's been delayed by a couple of regressions.
Regards,
Nick Telford
On 13 October 2011 14:24, Iroiso wrote:
> Hi all,
> Can anyone remind me wha
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> On the 1.0 housekeeping business, I've created two new svn branches:
> * 1.0.0: this is what will be ultimately released as the 1.0 final
> * 1.0: this is for stuff that don't made the freeze but should go in
> 1.0.1. Once 1.0 has been re
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>> To have things moving, I propose we aim for calling the vote on a first beta
>> release at the end of next week (say next Thursday for instance).
>
> My experience is that virtually
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> To have things moving, I propose we aim for calling the vote on a first beta
> release at the end of next week (say next Thursday for instance).
My experience is that virtually nobody tests a release until a beta is
available. So I'd be i
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> It is now September 8th everywhere which means that the 1.0 freeze is now in
> effect.
Sweet, thanks Sylvain. One question, are you we going to be branching?
--
Eric Evans
Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
On 06/16/2011 05:11 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
+1
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Cassandra 0.8 is now out and we'll hopefully soon have the first minor release
on that branch out too. It is now time to think of the next iteration, aka
Apache
There is already so much stuff on the 1.0 branch that I don't think 4 month to
feature freeze is a problem.
Assuming big stuff like new sstable format will go into 1.0, I am more
concerned about the 1 month from freeze to release.
Regards,
Terje
On 17 Jun 2011, at 01:39, Eric Evans wrote:
>
+1 on a plan and we're excited for 1.0 because that hopefully means that
Cassandra-1600 and friends will be resolved so that we can mapreduce over
subsets of rows and over secondary indexes.
On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Cassandra 0.8 is now o
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:36 +0200, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Sticking to that 4 months schedule, I propose the following deadlines:
> - September 8th: feature freeze
> - October 8th: release (tentative date)
+1
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 09:15 -0700, Ryan King wrote:
> I think maybe 4 months was too short? Do we optimistically want to try
> that again or plan on taking a bit more time?
I think 4 months is about the right amount of time.
Also, our upgrade story is better than it has ever been, which changes
t
I think maybe 4 months was too short? Do we optimistically want to try
that again or plan on taking a bit more time?
Either way I'm happy to have a plan. :)
-ryan
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>> Ladi
+1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Cassandra 0.8 is now out and we'll hopefully soon have the first minor release
> on that branch out too. It is now time to think of the next iteration, aka
> Apache Cassandra 1.0 (sounds amazing...).
>
> The 0
13 matches
Mail list logo
