Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-10-05 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
+1 Also, FWIW, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17927 has been resolved. On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 9:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > As long as those two are checked to be test issues and we agree to fix > them before next release, I am also +1 > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 9:42, Jos

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-10-03 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
As long as those two are checked to be test issues and we agree to fix them before next release, I am also +1 On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 9:42, Josh McKenzie wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > > +1 > > > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-10-03 Thread Josh McKenzie
+1 On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote: > >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well. > >> > >> Kind Regards, > >> Brandon > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 202

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-10-03 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
+1 > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi wrote: > > +1 > > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote: >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Brandon >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: The vote will be open for 72 hours (longe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-10-02 Thread Berenguer Blasi
+1 On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote: I'm +1 under these conditions as well. Kind Regards, Brandon On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-30 Thread Brandon Williams
I'm +1 under these conditions as well. Kind Regards, Brandon On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has >> tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered >> binding. A vote pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-30 Thread Jacek Lewandowski
+1 - - -- --- - - Jacek Lewandowski On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:38 AM Andrés de la Peña wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 09:26, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 08:11, Miklosovic, Stefan < >> stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-30 Thread Andrés de la Peña
+1 On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 09:26, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > +1 > > Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 08:11, Miklosovic, Stefan < > stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> >> From: Mick Semb Wever >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 15:13 >> To: dev >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-30 Thread Benjamin Lerer
+1 Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 08:11, Miklosovic, Stefan < stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > +1 > > > From: Mick Semb Wever > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 15:13 > To: dev > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1 > > NetApp Security WA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-29 Thread Miklosovic, Stefan
+1 From: Mick Semb Wever Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 15:13 To: dev Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1 NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and kno

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-29 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

2022-09-27 Thread Josh McKenzie
We have a couple new test failures that came up as regressions recently: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17928 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17927 Along with that, I'm not sure we're in a good spot from a "no flaky test" perspective as per butler: https://butler