Including my own, I count 3 binding +1's, 2 other +1 and no -1's. The vote
passes and I'll get the artifact published shortly.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jason Brown wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Carl Yeksigian
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Brandon Williams
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne"
> wrote:
> >
> > > There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed
> > those,
> > > so
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
> On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
>
> > There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed
> those,
> > so I propose
> > the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed those,
> so I propose
> the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
> should come quickly after that one.
>
> sha1: cfe51fb4f7aeddd424525b59451e71
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed those,
> so I propose
> the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
> should come quickly after that one.
>
> sha1: cfe51fb4f7aeddd424525b59451e71
