Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1 (non binding) On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote: >> >> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose >> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. >> >> SVN: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apach

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.ap

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.a

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-21 Thread Jeremy Hanna
Tried the artifacts on a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10. Ran the contrib/word_count, pig, and hadoop_output_streaming examples on a single node. Worked fine from that perspective (wanted to do a hadoop integration sanity check for the RC). +1 (non-binding) On Nov 20, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Eric Eva

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > +1 beta3. > +1 beta3. > -1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's > not do that any more. +1 on Gary's -1 to committing huge changes at the end of a cycle. -Brandon

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > -1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's > not do that any more. Agreed. Glass half full: we won't have to merge between byte[] and ByteBuffer from 0.7 to 0.8. -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra c

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 beta3. -1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's not do that any more. Gary. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 05:48, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3.  Broken HH is > not something we should have in the final release but we need to

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
I agree with that. The changes of #1367 are extensive enough that having a beta3 makes sense. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > ... actually this would require rebuilding the artifacts to change the > version string anyway, so I vote for releasing current 0.7 branch as > b

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Jonathan Ellis
... actually this would require rebuilding the artifacts to change the version string anyway, so I vote for releasing current 0.7 branch as beta3. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3. Broken HH is not > something we should

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Jonathan Ellis
I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3. Broken HH is not something we should have in the final release but we need to get wider testing of the other changes. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > I think Hinted handoff are buggy in current rc1-snapshot > (see h

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 (attempt #2)

2010-10-28 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
I think Hinted handoff are buggy in current rc1-snapshot (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1672). I think this pretty much prevent hints from being delivered. Don't know if that is considered harmful enough to re-roll RC1. -- Sylvain On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Eric Evans

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-25 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Agreed. Also, there were some potential bugs in the Thrift 0.5 conversion that are now fixed on the 0.7 branch. Let's re-roll rc1. On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Stu Hood wrote: > -1 > > bin/config-converter failed: see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1655 > > -Origina

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
Sounds reasonable: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1659 -Original Message- From: "Jonathan Ellis" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 5:08pm To: "dev" Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 Maybe we should set the new value to unframed always and include a w

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Jonathan Ellis
x27;t connect by default. I guess it's a > known issue. > > Sorry! > > -Original Message- > From: "Stu Hood" > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 2:03pm > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 > > And as the last variable,

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
a.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 And as the last variable, the src artifact builds and does not exhibit the problem, so this is very likely a problem with the classes in the bin artifact. -Original Message- From: "Stu Hood" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:59pm To: de

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
OTE] 0.7.0 RC1 I'm only seeing the problem with the artifacts. -Original Message- From: "Jonathan Ellis" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:51pm To: "dev" Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 Are you seeing this just on the artifacts or on trunk? Trunk gives me $

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
I'm only seeing the problem with the artifacts. -Original Message- From: "Jonathan Ellis" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:51pm To: "dev" Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 Are you seeing this just on the artifacts or on trunk? Trunk gives me $ bin/cassa

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Jonathan Ellis
te: > Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch: something > is not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats. > > -Original Message- > From: "Stu Hood" > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:28am > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject

RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
eadMessageBegin, old client? -Original Message- From: "Eric Evans" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:49am To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 11:44 -0500, Stu Hood wrote: > Also, client connections fail immediately with a vers

RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Eric Evans
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 11:44 -0500, Stu Hood wrote: > Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch: > something is not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats. Not seeing this, the system tests pass here. -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com

RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch: something is not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats. -Original Message- From: "Stu Hood" Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:28am To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 -1 bin/config

RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1

2010-10-23 Thread Stu Hood
-1 bin/config-converter failed: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1655 -Original Message- From: "Eric Evans" Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 10:28pm To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1 We're closing in on a final; it shouldn't be long now. I propos