Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC2

2010-11-11 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:39, Eric Evans wrote: > > A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2]) > made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an > 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following > artifacts for 0.6.8. > >

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC2

2010-11-11 Thread Chris Goffinet
+1 -Chris On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2]) > made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an > 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following > artifacts for 0.6

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC2

2010-11-11 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2]) > made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an > 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following > artifacts for 0.6.8. > >

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC2

2010-11-11 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2]) > made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an > 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following > artifacts for 0.6.8. >