On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> As I mentioned previously[3], there was an issue with the fix for the
> fix to CASSANDRA-1377[3], so I propose the follow for 0.6.5. Third time
> is the charm, right?
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...
+1
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:36, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> >>> Some important changes[1] have gone into the 0.6 branch since the
> >>> release, so let's cut this one a little early to get them into the
> >>> hands of users. I propo
+1
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:36, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>> Some important changes[1] have gone into the 0.6 branch since the
>>> release, so let's cut this one a little early to get them into the
>>> hands of users. I propose the following artifacts for 0.6.5.
>
>> Alright, so in light of CASSAND
+1
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>> Some important changes[1] have gone into the 0.6 branch since the
>>> release, so let's cut this one a little early to get them into the
>>> hands of users. I propose the following artifacts for 0.6.5.
>
>> Alright, so in light of CASSA