Thanks all for your responses. So I'll give back the CEP number (if I can).
For Dinesh's comment, I think we can take up in the DISCUSS thread for the
JIRA ticket that I'll start. I will make sure I understand his comment and
resolve it correctly.
Thanks
Maulin
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:47 AM Di
This could be just an enhancement jira. No need for a CEP.
I think this would be a fine addition to Cassandra. Please ensure that we can
support both PEM as well as the current JKS simultaneously.
Dinesh
> On Oct 11, 2021, at 3:06 AM, Stefan Miklosovic
> wrote:
>
> I agree with Benedict, t
I agree with Benedict, this does not need to have its own CEP.
In the "approach" section to-be-discussed CEP-17, I clearly see this
is building on top of what is already in so I do not think this needs
yet another CEP to materialize.
Regards
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 12:00, bened...@apache.org wro
Hi Maulin,
This sounds fine to me, though I don’t consider myself well versed in these
system details.
I have a meta comment though: I think this could easily have been a Jira with a
DISCUSS thread brought to the list. The CEP process is (in my opinion) for
complex decisions that needs broad c
