Seems well maintained and MIT licensed. +1 from me.
> On Nov 28, 2022, at 6:35 PM, Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
>
> Overall the library appears to be high quality, even going so far as
> to have regression tests between versions. I do, however, think that
> the long-term maintenance risk needs to b
Overall the library appears to be high quality, even going so far as
to have regression tests between versions. I do, however, think that
the long-term maintenance risk needs to be acknowledged here. I think
the *absolute* worst case scenario would be corruption or deletion of
source and artifacts,
I'm pleased with the rigor he shows on his explanations of implementation and
performance: http://obermuhlner.ch/wordpress/2016/06/02/bigdecimalmath/
Seems like it's probably stable given the infrequency of changes to it and he's
still actively merging patches submit by others:
https://github.c
