To tie this up, I've added the changes to the process that Mick flagged -
thanks! If there are any further alterations please let me know. If there
aren't any more improvements, I'll assume, using lazy consensus, that
everything is good if I don't hear back by EoW (4 March).
Thanks all!
On Fri, F
I must admit, I've not dived into Jira's much yet (I've done one, I think),
but if you think a separate Jira issue type would help, I'm all for
it, Mick!
*Topic review*
One thing that I'd like to highlight from the content process wiki page is
the need to review the topics we would like to cover a
Thanks, Mick! I’ll make those amends. On 2022/02/17 14:38:12 Mick Semb Wever wrote:> > * Content pipeline overview> >> > > Awesome stuff Chris!> > Under the "Pull Request Approval" section there's some inaccuracies, if we> presume staging == cassandra.staged.apache.org.> > The content is pushed to
