Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-11-01 Thread Eric Evans
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:30 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > I appreciate your creating a debian package before the vote, but now > that the vote's passed I don't see it on the project downloads page. > Shirley, I can't be the only one who wants a .deb. ? Probably not. And stop calling me Shire

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-11-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On 11/1/2010 6:01 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 10:55 -0500, Eric Evans wrote: >> The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to >> see more testing after the somewhat disruptive changes made in >> CASSANDRA-1367[2]. Thus, I propose the follow artifacts for

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-11-01 Thread Eric Evans
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 10:55 -0500, Eric Evans wrote: > The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to > see more testing after the somewhat disruptive changes made in > CASSANDRA-1367[2]. Thus, I propose the follow artifacts for release as > beta3. > > SVN: > https://svn.a

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-11-01 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:55, Eric Evans wrote: > > The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to > see more testing after the somewhat disruptive changes made in > CASSANDRA-1367[2].  Thus, I propose the follow artifacts for release as > beta3. > > SVN: > https://svn

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-10-31 Thread Chris Goffinet
+1 -Chris On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Stu Hood wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: "Eric Evans" > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:55am > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3 > > > The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to

RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-10-31 Thread Stu Hood
+1 -Original Message- From: "Eric Evans" Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:55am To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3 The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to see more testing after the somewhat disruptive changes made in CASSANDRA-1367

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3

2010-10-31 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to > see more testing after the somewhat disruptive changes made in > CASSANDRA-1367[2].  Thus, I propose the follow artifacts for release as > beta3. > > SVN: > https://