You're right Eric, you always need to make choices and tell advanteges
and drawbacks apart.
I think my question was based in the "fear", and the expirience. It's
like saying xQL always makes me shiver.
Also I was thinking, if Google did it (with GQL for AppEngine) then,
it's nothing to worry abou
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Santiago Basulto
wrote:
> Sorry Eric, i think you misunderstood me. I'm not criticizing
> (speaking against) CQL. As I said i watched your presentation, and i
> agree with you. After all, you guys are software engineers and you
> know what you're doing.
That's OK,
Sorry Eric, i think you misunderstood me. I'm not criticizing
(speaking against) CQL. As I said i watched your presentation, and i
agree with you. After all, you guys are software engineers and you
know what you're doing.
I'm just asking if you have thought about it, and in that case, how to
keep
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Santiago Basulto
wrote:
> I've been taking a look at Cassandra code for a while (since last
> year) and using and trying it "in home". Nowdays i've started to take
> a look at the "new stuff", more precisely to CQL. I think it's great,
> I mean, just taking a look a
Hello people,
i'm new in Cassandra. Sorry if i'm offending with this question, but,
i have to ask:
I've been taking a look at Cassandra code for a while (since last
year) and using and trying it "in home". Nowdays i've started to take
a look at the "new stuff", more precisely to CQL. I think it's
