I guess it depends what you mean by considerably. My initial thought was
that, yes, this proposal would require CAS serialization scope to be
per-key instead of the current per-table-per-key. That can only increase
contention by a factor of at most the number of tables. Whether this is a
considerab
No such plans. You'd increase contention across tables considerably.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ramon Nogueira wrote:
> Referring to this article on the recently added CAS features:
> http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql-in-2-0-6
>
> The new CAS batch feature is really cool; are there any
Referring to this article on the recently added CAS features:
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql-in-2-0-6
The new CAS batch feature is really cool; are there any plans to support
CAS across column families within a batch? I think this would solve the
same problems solved by the "static columns"
