Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
There's a couple more points to be made here, I think. First, we've also gone to a great deal of effort to make upgrading seamless, and we recently (1.0.3) added support for seamless downgrading as well. Anyone with a staging cluster (which should be everyone) can drop 1.0.4 on a single node, see

Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-30 Thread Bill Au
I think we definitely need better quality for the releases. Just looked at 1.0.3 and 1.0.4. I am willing to test out release candidate and report back my finding on the mailing list. Hopefully more folks can do that to make the testing more comprehensive. And folks with binding votes can take t

Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-29 Thread Joe Stein
I need at least a week, maybe two to promote anything to staging which is mainly because we do weekly releases. I could introduce a 2 day turn around but only with a more fixed type schedule. I am running 0.8.6 in production and REALLY want to upgrade for nothing more than getting compression

Re: Discussion: release quality

2011-11-29 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > I'd like to start a discussion about ideas to improve release quality for > Cassandra. Specifically I wonder if the community can do more to help the > project as a whole become more solid. Cassandra has an active and vibrant > community usi

Discussion: release quality

2011-11-29 Thread Jeremy Hanna
I'd like to start a discussion about ideas to improve release quality for Cassandra. Specifically I wonder if the community can do more to help the project as a whole become more solid. Cassandra has an active and vibrant community using Cassandra for a variety of things. If we all pitch in a