On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> On the 1.0 housekeeping business, I've created two new svn branches:
> * 1.0.0: this is what will be ultimately released as the 1.0 final
> * 1.0: this is for stuff that don't made the freeze but should go in
> 1.0.1. Once 1.0 has been re
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>> To have things moving, I propose we aim for calling the vote on a first beta
>> release at the end of next week (say next Thursday for instance).
>
> My experience is that virtually
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> To have things moving, I propose we aim for calling the vote on a first beta
> release at the end of next week (say next Thursday for instance).
My experience is that virtually nobody tests a release until a beta is
available. So I'd be i
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> It is now September 8th everywhere which means that the 1.0 freeze is now in
> effect.
Sweet, thanks Sylvain. One question, are you we going to be branching?
--
Eric Evans
Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is now September 8th everywhere which means that the 1.0 freeze is now in
effect.
We are now entering the phase of heavy testing/debugging, aiming at a final
release October 8th. This means a month, which in my opinion can be done, but
only if we all focus our efforts ib
