this behavior as well with 0.6, heap usage graphs look almost
>>> identical. The GC is a noticeable bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
>>> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoo
noticeable bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
>> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
>> *To:* u...@cassandra
ble bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
>> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
>> *To:* u...@cassandra.apache.or
t:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
> *To:* u...@cassandra.apache.org; dev@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
>
>
>
> I wonder if anyone can use:
>
> * Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
> to confirm this:
> http://www.slidesh
l 19, 2010 4:15 AM
To: u...@cassandra.apache.org; dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
-
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
- m.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Hot on the trails of 0.6.0 comes our latest, 0.6.1. This stable point
