Well. I feel stupid now :)
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:49 PM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Kjellman
> wrote:
>
>> I¹ve also seen behavior where prepared statements are lost during a
>> rolling restart..haven¹t had a chance to debug/git bisect yet. Anyone e
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Kjellman
wrote:
> I¹ve also seen behavior where prepared statements are lost during a
> rolling restart..haven¹t had a chance to debug/git bisect yet. Anyone else
> seen anything similar?
>
I'd be somewhat surprised if someone hasn't. We don't persists pre
I¹ve also seen behavior where prepared statements are lost during a
rolling restart..haven¹t had a chance to debug/git bisect yet. Anyone else
seen anything similar?
On 12/16/13, 10:40 PM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
>Alright, this vote is thus close. I'll re-roll when we've made sure we
>fixed al
Alright, this vote is thus close. I'll re-roll when we've made sure we
fixed all the regressions so we'll see when that is.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> Or rather: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6493
>
> I would still prefer a 24h vote
Ok, so this vote is closed and I'll re-roll new artifacts shortly.
The new vote will be 24h only (unless someone strongly objects).
--
Sylvain
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Changing vote to -1; CASSANDRA-6345 introduced a regression that is
> now fixed in CASSANDRA-6
