The vote passed with 6 binding +1's and no -1's
Thanks everybody.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 23:34, Michael Shuler wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 10/11/21 4:47 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
> > a vote on that.
> >
> > It
+1
On 10/11/21 4:47 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
Hi list,
based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
a vote on that.
It seems to me CEP-16 is so straightforward there is more or less
nothing to discuss in more depth as the feedback it gathered was
mostly formal and n
+1 nb
On 10/11/21, 3:51 AM, "Stefan Miklosovic"
wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
Hi list,
based on the discussion thread about CEP-16
+1
> On Oct 11, 2021, at 2:50 AM, Stefan Miklosovic
> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
> a vote on that.
>
> It seems to me CEP-16 is so straightforward there is more or less
> nothing to discuss in more depth as the feedback it ga
+1
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 4:50 AM Stefan Miklosovic
wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
> a vote on that.
>
> It seems to me CEP-16 is so straightforward there is more or less
> nothing to discuss in more depth as the feedback it gathered
+1 nb
> On Oct 11, 2021, at 6:16 AM, Ekaterina Dimitrova
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 6:54, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Le lun. 11 oct. 2021 à 11:50, Stefan Miklosovic <
>> stefan.mikloso...@instaclustr.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> based on the discussio
+1
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 6:54, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> +1
>
> Le lun. 11 oct. 2021 à 11:50, Stefan Miklosovic <
> stefan.mikloso...@instaclustr.com> a écrit :
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
> > a vote on that.
> >
> > It seems to me
+1
Le lun. 11 oct. 2021 à 11:50, Stefan Miklosovic <
stefan.mikloso...@instaclustr.com> a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
> a vote on that.
>
> It seems to me CEP-16 is so straightforward there is more or less
> nothing to discuss in mo
Hi list,
based on the discussion thread about CEP-16 (1), I would like to have
a vote on that.
It seems to me CEP-16 is so straightforward there is more or less
nothing to discuss in more depth as the feedback it gathered was
mostly formal and nobody has had any objections so far having the
discu
