Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-25 Thread Yifan Cai
The vote passes with 3 binding +1, 3 non binding, and no vetoes. Thanks to everyone who was part of the discussion! - Yifan On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 3:57 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 for reasons stated in the discussion. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Yifan Cai

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-07 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 for reasons stated in the discussion. Kind Regards, Brandon On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Yifan Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. > > There is a discussion thread on the topic. In summary, the backport would > benefit Cassandra

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-07 Thread Josh McKenzie
+1. I'm ultimately in favor of setting the precedent of allowing low-risk ecosystem interop changes in non-trunk. On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 2:10 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > +1 > > I think this is a low risk change which is going to avoid duplication of > effort so it is worth it. > > On Sat, Aug

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-07 Thread Dinesh Joshi
+1 I think this is a low risk change which is going to avoid duplication of effort so it is worth it. On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 11:19 PM Yifan Cai wrote: > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. > > There is a discussion thread >

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-05 Thread J. D. Jordan
I am +1 (nb) for 5.0. -0 for 4.0 and 4.1.I would rather promote people upgrade to the latest release to get new features.I also think we have been doing a pretty good job of backwards compatibility lately, so I would also promote the side projects using the latest release to work with data from old

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-05 Thread Jeff Jirsa
As Josh mentioned previously, not all procedural votes treat -1s as vetoes. I remain against the backport to 4.0 and 4.1, but not a veto. -1 for those branches. On Aug 3, 2024, at 11:19 PM, Yifan Cai wrote:Hi,I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. There is a dis

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-05 Thread Francisco Guerrero
+1 (nb) On 2024/08/05 14:51:11 Jon Haddad wrote: > -0 for the reasons in the discuss thread. > > — > Jon Haddad > Rustyrazorblade Consulting > rustyrazorblade.com > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:13 AM Doug Rohrer wrote: > > > +1 (nb) > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-05 Thread Jon Haddad
-0 for the reasons in the discuss thread. — Jon Haddad Rustyrazorblade Consulting rustyrazorblade.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:13 AM Doug Rohrer wrote: > +1 (nb) > > > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-05 Thread Doug Rohrer
+1 (nb) > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. > > There is a discussion thread > on the > topic. In summary, the backport would b

[VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

2024-08-03 Thread Yifan Cai
Hi, I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. There is a discussion thread on the topic. In summary, the backport would benefit Cassandra Analytics by providing a unified solution, and the patch is