With four binding +1s, 2 +0s, and no -1s, and 6 non-binding +1s, the
vote passes.
To re-iterate, resolving the license concerns is part of bringing
software into the project, not a reason to avoid trying. The incubator
PMC will have no problem sending a -1 if we cant get everything
together.
Reg
+1.
Chris already expressed his intent to stay and keep the maintenance of the
project ongoing. As previously mentioned, I'm also going to keep
contributing to the driver.
Having it under the umbrella of Apache/Cassandra does add to it's weight as
the related project.
Alex.
On Thu., 13 Sep. 201
My +1 was under the assumption that the current maintainer wanted to continue
with the project and would be brought in to do that along with the code.
But my +1 also has no meaning in the ASF meritocracy as I am neither a
committer or a PMC member ;). It just expresses my opinion as a long stan
No, doesn’t change it. Any code donation has to go through the incubation
process, which is where all the legal stuff about it being donated is handled.
This would be like the dtest repo which was donated a little while back, and
followed this same process.
-Jeremiah
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 3:
In the previous thread we seemed to come to the conclusion it would be
under the same project with same committers/pmc. I don't know if sending it
through incubation changes that?
On Wed., 12 Sep. 2018, 13:03 Jeremy Hanna,
wrote:
> I don’t know if others have this same question, but what does ac
+1. I do share the same concerns as Sylvain, but I think it's important we
get more driver experience/exposure in the project, as it seems lacking
since datastax moved off, and I don't think this will be something we can
just leave to the userbase to solve.
I'm definitely looking to contribute as
I don’t know if others have this same question, but what does accepting the
gocql driver donation mean? It becomes a full Apache project separate from
Cassandra and there exists a separate set of PMC members and such? Or does it
become part of the Cassandra project itself? From Sylvain and Jo
+1
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:55 PM Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> I'm +0, and I share the same concerns as Sylvain.
>
> For those of you that have +1'ed, are you planning on contributing to the
> driver? Docs, code, QA? It's easy to throw a +1 down to make the driver
> the responsibility of the proj
I'm +0, and I share the same concerns as Sylvain.
For those of you that have +1'ed, are you planning on contributing to the
driver? Docs, code, QA? It's easy to throw a +1 down to make the driver
the responsibility of the project if you're asking others to do the work.
I vote this way because I
+1
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:37 AM Dinesh Joshi
wrote:
> +1
>
> Dinesh
>
> > On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Jaydeep Chovatia <
> chovatia.jayd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Roopa Tangirala
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> *Regards,*
> >>
> >> *Roo
+1
Dinesh
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Jaydeep Chovatia
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Roopa Tangirala
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> *Regards,*
>>
>> *Roopa Tangirala*
>>
>> Engineering Manager CDE
>>
>> *(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed,
+1
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Roopa Tangirala
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> *Regards,*
>
> *Roopa Tangirala*
>
> Engineering Manager CDE
>
> *(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:51 AM Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > -0
> >
> > The project seems to have a hard time getting
+1
*Regards,*
*Roopa Tangirala*
Engineering Manager CDE
*(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:51 AM Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> -0
>
> The project seems to have a hard time getting on top of reviewing his
> backlog
> of 'patch available' issues, so that I'm skeptical adopti
-0
The project seems to have a hard time getting on top of reviewing his
backlog
of 'patch available' issues, so that I'm skeptical adopting more code to
maintain is the thing the project needs the most right now. Besides, I'm
also
generally skeptical that augmenting the scope of a project makes i
+1
But I also think getting this through incubation might take a while/be
impossible given how large the contributor list looks…
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> +1
>
> (Incubation looks like it may be challenging to get acceptance from all
> existing contributors, thoug
+1
(Incubation looks like it may be challenging to get acceptance from all
existing contributors, though)
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Nate McCall wrote:
>
> This will be the same process used for dtest. We will need to walk
> this through the incubator per the process outli
+1
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:12 AM Nate McCall wrote:
> This will be the same process used for dtest. We will need to walk
> this through the incubator per the process outlined here:
>
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html
>
> Pending the outcome of this vote, we will create th
This will be the same process used for dtest. We will need to walk
this through the incubator per the process outlined here:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html
Pending the outcome of this vote, we will create the JIRA issues for
tracking and after we go through the process, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
