On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:39 -0600, Eric Evans wrote:
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1034172
> 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>
> In the first go 'round, most people seemed happy to shorten this vote to
> 24 hours, so unless there are
+1
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:39, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
> made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
> 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6.8.
>
>
+1
-Chris
On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
> made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
> 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
> made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
> 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6.8.
>
>
+1
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
> made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
> 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6.8.
>
A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
artifacts for 0.6.8.
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandr
