Re: [REVIEW REQUEST] Exposing the status of a cleanup command on a virtual table

2024-09-27 Thread guo Maxwell
Hi, Can we make some schema adjustments to System.compaction_history table to meet our needs? For example : If there is no task execution, what about just recording 0 bytes_in, 0 bytes_out for this compaction history . Other status can be placed in compaction_properties, and you can even add a c

Re: [REVIEW REQUEST] Exposing the status of a cleanup command on a virtual table

2024-09-27 Thread Štefan Miklošovič
Thank you Maxim for summarizing it like this for better visibility of what you are suggesting to contribute. I am OK with that in general but: 1) The table should be limited in its size (I think the original patch you had was already done with space-limitation in mind). Since we want to put this

Re: [REVIEW REQUEST] Exposing the status of a cleanup command on a virtual table

2024-09-27 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Hello everyone, I still need a few more eyes on [1][2], but this time I'm going to try and do some marketing for the feature I'm talking about, so... We are trying to bridge the gap between the API that is called and the compaction process that MAY or MAY NOT be called as a result, and make user

[REVIEW REQUEST] Exposing the status of a cleanup command on a virtual table

2024-07-15 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Hello everyone, I would like to gently ask for help in reviewing the following issue that we've been facing for a while: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19760 When a cleanup command is called, the compaction process under the hood is triggered accordingly. However, if there is not