Re: Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-03-02 Thread Chris Thornett
To tie this up, I've added the changes to the process that Mick flagged - thanks! If there are any further alterations please let me know. If there aren't any more improvements, I'll assume, using lazy consensus, that everything is good if I don't hear back by EoW (4 March). Thanks all! On Fri, F

Re: Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-18 Thread Chris Thornett
I must admit, I've not dived into Jira's much yet (I've done one, I think), but if you think a separate Jira issue type would help, I'm all for it, Mick! *Topic review* One thing that I'd like to highlight from the content process wiki page is the need to review the topics we would like to cover a

RE: Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-17 Thread Chris Thornett
Thanks, Mick! I’ll make those amends. On 2022/02/17 14:38:12 Mick Semb Wever wrote:> > * Content pipeline overview> >> > > Awesome stuff Chris!> > Under the "Pull Request Approval" section there's some inaccuracies, if we> presume staging == cassandra.staged.apache.org.> > The content is pushed to

Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-17 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> Awesome stuff Chris! > Still in awe, so much good stuff here. It makes me think if we should have a separate jira issue type for content, given its different workflow steps. This wouldn't shorten the six day turn around, but might help our overall throughput of content (without any of it unnec

Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-17 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> * Content pipeline overview > Awesome stuff Chris! Under the "Pull Request Approval" section there's some inaccuracies, if we presume staging == cassandra.staged.apache.org. The content is pushed to staging *after* it is committed to trunk (and is automatic). The check on staging should not b

Re: [FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-17 Thread Paulo Motta
Fixing the updated link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/%28draft%29+Apache+Cassandra+blog+content+process (haven't reviewed yet) Em qui., 17 de fev. de 2022 às 10:21, Chris Thornett escreveu: > For those who are interested in content, I've added a draft page on the > Apac

[FOR REVIEW] Content Pipeline Process wiki

2022-02-17 Thread Chris Thornett
For those who are interested in content, I've added a draft page on the Apache Cassandra content process to the wiki (as requested) for discussion and finalizing. *Note:* This is different to documentation. This is essentially the content marketing for the project. Since 4.0, there has been more