Re: [DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

2023-11-29 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Thanks, Mick It seems that no one had objections to your suggestion so I will move forward with that: “I suggest, for expediency, to - put a nice failure message in Sjk.java (e.g. "JDK required for this nodetool command"), - add a comment in cassandra.yaml in front of audit_logging_options stati

Re: [DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

2023-11-21 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> Given we have functionality that depends on a JDK, and all our testing is > done with a JDK, I'm in favour of printing a warning that JDK is > recommended, from 5.0 onwards. And before 5.0 just leaving things in the > state they are in. > Correction: ignore these two sentences. They should ha

Re: [DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

2023-11-21 Thread Michael Semb Wever
> jdk. attach is needed for nodetool sjk hh. When someone tries to use > that command, they get an error that JDK is expected. There isn't > anything to do about that here. Given we have functionality that depends on a JDK, and all our testing is done with a JDK, I'm in favour of printing a w

[DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

2023-11-20 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Hi everyone, Some of you remember that Paulo raised a concern around warnings about missing modules on startup during the 5.0 alpha2 voting.[1] We opened the ticket CASSANDRA-19001. The problem turned out to be not a 5.0 one. Those modules are missing when we run Cassandra on JRE. Those warnings h