Re: [DISCUSS] The Severity of CASSANDRA-16807

Agreed. In any case, a patch is now available. On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 3:32 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > I discussed this with Caleb on slack, and these queries fail in both > 3.x and 4.0. The difference is that in 4.0 they will receive a

Re: [DISCUSS] The Severity of CASSANDRA-16807

I discussed this with Caleb on slack, and these queries fail in both 3.x and 4.0. The difference is that in 4.0 they will receive an internal server error from the assertion, whereas on 3.x they will just receive an incorrect response that they will believe to be correct. Given that this is incor

[DISCUSS] The Severity of CASSANDRA-16807

tl;dr At best CASSANDRA-16807 means some queries that shouldn't fail do fail, and at worst, this is a potentially dangerous consistency problem. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16807 I'm working on a solution either way, but I want to see if there are any opinions out there on whe