It’s not that complicated and can make any work. There is just no consensus
on which of the three options and don’t wanna go back and forth as
different people review it.
Chris
On Thursday, September 5, 2019, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> Reading the ticket, I see 3 options being discussed.
>
> 1. Impl
Reading the ticket, I see 3 options being discussed.
1. Implement Server Side DESCRIBE
2. Virtual Table (current patch)
3. Go with Virtual Table now, implement Server Side DESCRIBE later (as it is
invasive)
Is it complicated to port your current patch to implement DESCRIBE instead of a
virtual
In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14825 its been discussed
on how a server side DDL can be provided to clients.
The original thought was to use a virtual table to make it less invasive of
a change while providing access to the TableCQLHelper output (and fixing
it).
The other is t
