human being if they’re really
> > > reviewing
> > > > something or not, there’s no way to find out by yourself. If the
> > > “Awaiting
> > > > Second Review” state is interpreted as perhaps only needing a second
> > > > reviewer, a report can ea
yourself. If the
> > “Awaiting
> > > Second Review” state is interpreted as perhaps only needing a second
> > > reviewer, a report can easily distinguish this by listing the contents of
> > > the Reviewers column.
> > >
> > > But, I don’t anticipa
by yourself. If the
> “Awaiting
> > Second Review” state is interpreted as perhaps only needing a second
> > reviewer, a report can easily distinguish this by listing the contents of
> > the Reviewers column.
> >
> > But, I don’t anticipate losing any sleep over whateve
an easily distinguish this by listing the contents of
> the Reviewers column.
>
> But, I don’t anticipate losing any sleep over whatever we decide here.
>
> From: Ekaterina Dimitrova
> Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 15:37
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISC
here.
From: Ekaterina Dimitrova
Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 15:37
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Jira state for second reviewer
My only worry is that If we incorporate both things in one state this means
that people won’t be able to find immediately tickets to assign for
2 August 2021 at 15:15
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Jira state for second reviewer
> Thank you all.
> On Benedict’s question, my understanding is that the idea of Needs Second
> Reviewer is to indicate we need to find a second reviewer. I suspect when
>
>
> From: Brandon Williams
> Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 14:57
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Jira state for second reviewer
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:40 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
>
; From: Brandon Williams
> Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 14:57
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Jira state for second reviewer
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:40 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > W
ew could not yet have gotten underway?
> It’s unclear to me what you would do in this case – would it return to
> Patch Available, or sit in Needs Second Reviewer?
>
> From: Brandon Williams
> Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 14:57
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject:
Reviewer?
From: Brandon Williams
Date: Monday, 2 August 2021 at 14:57
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Jira state for second reviewer
+1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:40 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> While triaging tickets last week, we realized that t
+1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:40 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> While triaging tickets last week, we realized that the new state works well
> with only one caveat. The expectation is Patch Available to be used when
> there is no reviewer available and Needs Reviewer to be used w
+1, agreed this makes its purpose more explicit.
Em seg., 2 de ago. de 2021 às 10:40, Ekaterina Dimitrova <
e.dimitr...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While triaging tickets last week, we realized that the new state works well
> with only one caveat. The expectation is Patch Available to
Hi everyone,
While triaging tickets last week, we realized that the new state works well
with only one caveat. The expectation is Patch Available to be used when
there is no reviewer available and Needs Reviewer to be used when we need a
second reviewer. The name Needs Reviewer might be confusing
That sounds good to me. Thanks a lot Brandon and Ekaterina for taking care
of that.
Le mer. 7 juil. 2021 à 23:47, Ekaterina Dimitrova a
écrit :
> Hey everyone,
> Considering the latest report of patches which need a reviewer, I think
> this new Jira state is a great addition.
> I took it one ste
Hey everyone,
Considering the latest report of patches which need a reviewer, I think
this new Jira state is a great addition.
I took it one step further today and asked for it to be available after
PATCH AVAILABLE too. This is already implemented. I hope Brandon doesn’t
mind my intervention. The r
+1
Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 05:58, Caleb Rackliffe a
écrit :
> +1
>
> > On Jun 30, 2021, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since our project governance requires two committers, which in some
> > circumstances may mean two committers need to review, I'd like to add
> > an
+1
> On Jun 30, 2021, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Since our project governance requires two committers, which in some
> circumstances may mean two committers need to review, I'd like to add
> another state to our jira such that finding tickets that need a second
> review
+1 sounds good. I recall seeing the conversation in #cassandra-dev --
weren't you also going to add a tag so it's easy to pick the tickets that
need a second reviewer? Cheers!
Hello,
Since our project governance requires two committers, which in some
circumstances may mean two committers need to review, I'd like to add
another state to our jira such that finding tickets that need a second
reviewer is possible, since it is not currently.
On slack, Paulo Motta suggested
19 matches
Mail list logo
