Re: [DISCUSS] GoCQL sub modules vs packages

+1 on making the change before cutting a 2.0.0 release Jackson Fleming escreveu (terça, 19/11/2024 à(s) 22:03): > I concur with the approach of having a single module for the driver, I > don't think this project is complicated enough yet to require > separate modules, the project is new to the A

Re: [DISCUSS] GoCQL sub modules vs packages

I concur with the approach of having a single module for the driver, I don't think this project is complicated enough yet to require separate modules, the project is new to the Apache foundation and keeping things simple will make it easier for people to learn and contribute. I also agree that we

RE: [DISCUSS] GoCQL sub modules vs packages

I'm in favor of the packages approach as discussed. Reference to my earlier comment here: GitHub Issue #1770 .

[DISCUSS] GoCQL sub modules vs packages

The goal of CASSGO-21 [1] is to move HostPoolHostPolicy out of the main package so that users don't have to download the github.com/hailocab/go-hostpool dependency if they are not using this specific policy. The question is whether we want to move this policy to a separate module or if it is enough