9 PM Vivekanand Koya <13vivekk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Made some progress. After adding
> throughout build.xml and compiling the 5.03 branch with openjdk 17.0.15
> 2025-04-15
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.15+6 (build 17.0.15+6) I got a
> build Failed error at the s
; >>
> >> Why not?
> >>
> >> Personally, I hate the idea of treating a codebase (any codebase) like
> a house of cards that can't be touched. It never made sense to me to try
> to bundle new features / bug fixes with improvements to code quality.
> >&g
Line actions
To: Vivekanand Koya <13vivekk...@gmail.com>,
Hi Vivekanand,
I'm actually currently trying to figure out how much information I can
share around the setup we used. I can summarize what is already public
information from my presentations.
I'm using Cassandra 4 and JDK 21,
I can also provide potential examples if you'd like.
Thanks,
Vivekanand K.
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 10:18 AM Vivekanand Koya <13vivekk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would say that https://openjdk.org/jeps/394 (instanceOf) aims to
> provide safer and less poisoning in the code by de
lowing
> things up for users that would warrant going through the codebase to tidy
> this up? Between src/java and test/unit and test/distributed we have around
> 2,000 occurrences of this pattern.
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2025, at 10:14 AM, Vivekanand Koya wrote:
>
> Sounds great. I w
f weeks)
> makes sense to me. For bugfixing, targeting the oldest supported GA branch
> and the highest language level that works there would allow maximum
> flexibility with minimal re-implementation.
>
> If anyone has any misgivings with certain features (i.e. the debate around
Hello,
I want to understand the community's thoughts on using newer features (post
JDK11) in upcoming releases in Cassandra. An example is flow scoping
instead of explicitly casting types with instanceOf:
https://openjdk.org/jeps/395. I want your thoughts on JDK requirements for
the main Cassandra
