On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Jeremiah Jordan
wrote:
> Sounds interesting to me. I looked into adding protocol buffer support at
> one point, and it didn't look like it would be too much work. The tricky
> part was I also wanted to add indexing support for attributes of the inserted
> prot
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, bxqdev wrote:
> i guess that's what nazis cited to jews in 30's ;)
>
Ok everyone -- it's now ok to stop the discussion, as per Godwin's
law! [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> You perhaps are not a veteran of the braces wars of 1973-2011...
>
> Please don't try to start them up again!
>
> Every project has its own style. Stick to that style.
+1
known as the "When in Rome..." convention.
-+ Tatu +-
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Eric Martell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having 10 millions of rows with in sql db in key table.
>
> key_id -> key_value
>
>
> For each request I am fetching one key_id and removing that
> from the key table. Each request should get unique key_id. Similar to
> java qu
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Nobody's forcing you to upgrade. If you want twice as much time
> between upgrading, just wait for 1.2. In the meantime, people who
> need the features in 1.1 also get those early (no, running trunk in
> production isn't a serious option).
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
...
>> Why? "To make things easier for mvn users" isn't enough of an
>> argument to convince me.
>>
>
> I can't really help you with that. Maven users make up a considerable
> segment o
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Ran Tavory wrote:
> +1 For boon.
> I kinda liked it...
:-)
Surely we can find a minor tweak to bloom, and call "enhanced version
Boon filter. Plus there's plenty of related names from thereon! (boom,
booze etc).
-+ Tatu +-
