rt it out, but I don't think it's within the
> purview/charter
> > of the project to bless third-party libraries. For libraries/content
> that
> > are shipped with officially Apache artifacts, there are clear and
> specific
> > standards in terms of licenses, intellectual property, etc., and
> endorsing
> > (versus simply listing) third-party components on a project site is
> probably
> > inappropriate. (IMHO.) What happens on a third party's site is another
> > matter.
> >
> > -- Paul
>
>
>
>
> --
> /Ran
>
--
Simon Reavely
simon.reav...@gmail.com
. (It's not very fun to
> hunt through the commits in trunk to find that magic commit.)
>
> -Kelvin
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Simon Reavely
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to apply the latest patch from
> > https://issues.apache.org
patch does not apply
Any help greatly appreciated!
--
Simon Reavely
simon.reav...@gmail.com
this decision to
address a target user base. Of course we might also conclude that its just
"not a Cassandra use-case"!
Cheers,
Simon
--
Simon Reavely
simon.reav...@gmail.com
this ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1546
>
> 1546 aims to find consensus with an alternate approach to counting. There
> is hope that some counting mechanism will make it into 0.7.0.
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Simon Reavely wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
going in 0.7.0 (since the clock was rolled back on the thrift API
on 9/14)?
B) Although it might be a top candiate for 0.7.1 there is no date for that?
So any good guesses on when this feature will get in such that I can use
that date in my planning?
Cheers,
Simon
--
Simon Reavely
simon.reav...@gmail.com
