On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Dikang Gu wrote:
> RocksDB has the feature called "Compaction Filter" to allow application to
> modify/delete a key-value during the background compaction.
> https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/v4.1/include/rocksdb/options.h#L201-L226
>
> I'm wondering is th
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Brian Tarbox wrote:
> My group is seeing the same thing and also can not figure out why its
> happening.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Anishek Agarwal
> wrote:
>
>> Forgot to mention I am using Cassandra 2.0.13
>>
>
This seems like a rather significant bug
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Philo Yang wrote:
> After reading some docs, I find that bloom filter is built on row keys,
> not on column key. Can anyone tell me what is considered for not building
> bloom filter on column key? Is it a good idea to offer a table property
> option between row
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Girish Kumar wrote:
> When high number of Pending tasks are showing up what it means to
> cassandra? What are the reasons for high number pending tasks? Does that
> mean Cassandra is overloaded ?
>
It means that tasks have been queued to run inside of a Thread Po
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Juan Manuel Formoso wrote:
> Any better alternatives than creating a small application that reads from
> one cluster and inserts in the new one that anybody can suggest?
>
>
http://www.palominodb.com/blog/2012/09/25/bulk-loading-options-cassandra
In theory if you
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Juan Manuel Formoso wrote:
> I am running shuffle on a cluster after upgrading to 1.2.X, and I don't
> understand how to check progress.
>
If your shuffle succeeds, you will be the first reported case of shuffle
succeeding on a non-test cluster. Until I hear a re
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Colin Kuo wrote:
> We followed the upgrade
> guide(http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.2/install/upgrading) from Datastax web
> site and upgraded Cassadra to 1.2.5, but it occurred errors in system.log
> when starting up.
In general you should not upgrade more than on
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> I was wondering if this (and supporting patches?) could be easily applied to
> 0.74, or if the current trunk is stable enough to use.
>
> I think twitter is using this in their Rainman product.. ideally they will
> release that soon as well ;
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> I've been uncomfortable with the amount of features I perceive are
> going into our maintenance releases for a while now. [...] IMO,
> maintenance releases (0.7.1, 0.7.2, etc.) should only contain bug
> fixes and *carefully* vetted features
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Chris Goffinet wrote:
> For nodes that might have a drive failure, but same ip address, what do you
> think about supplying the node's same token + autobootstrap set to true? This
> process works in trunk, but not all the data seems to be streamed over from
>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> I've said it elsewhere, but the only reason to fuss about a 1.0, is that
> it is loaded with special meaning. To impart some vague notion of
> readiness on people who should be paying less attention to a number, and
> doing more due diligence.
11 matches
Mail list logo
