In FailureDetector, in ArrivalWindow, in "double p(double t)",
is
return 1 - ( 1 - Math.pow(Math.E, exponent) );
really needed, instead of
return Math.pow(Math.E, exponent) ;
I believe the integral of the the Exponential Distribution from "t" to
infinity leads to the latter val
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Masood Mortazavi <
masoodmortaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Masood Mortazavi
>> wrote:
>> > The comment on the top of RackAwareStrategy sa
For revision 955080
"ant test" builds with no failures on Mac OS-X 10.6.2
It fails on Windows XP 2002 SP3.
Does running target "test" log anything anywhere?
- m.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Masood Mortazavi
> wrote:
> > The comment on the top of RackAwareStrategy says:
>
> You are correct. RAS sort of works under other conditions but it is
> primarily intended for 2
Hi,
Ran into this as I was going through the new config files for data centers
and racks.
(I may have some comments on those configuration models but will send them
later.)
Turning to RackAwareStrategy.java:
The comment on the top of RackAwareStrategy says:
/*
* This Replication Strategy retur
Is the clearer interpretation of this statement (in
conf/datacenters.properties) given anywhere else?
# The sum of all the datacenter replication factor values should equal
# the replication factor of the keyspace (i.e. sum(dc_rf) = RF)
# keyspace\:datacenter=replication factor
Keyspace1\:DC1=3
K
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, David Strauss wrote:
> On 2010-06-15 03:58, Masood Mortazavi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My assumption is that what one finds in
> >
> > interface/thrift/gen-java
> >
> > is actually generated code.
> >
Hi,
My assumption is that what one finds in
interface/thrift/gen-java
is actually generated code.
If so, why is it checked in as source under SVN?
(Certainly, the avro generated code doesn't seem to be checked in.)
Regards,
Masood
I never see any JIRA update notifications on dev@cassandra.apache.org
(In fact, there seems to be no automated dev notifications there.)
This may be by intent.
If so, are the JIRA updates directed elsewhere? Is there another target
e-mail alias?
Sending JIRA notifications to an e-mail addre
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false"
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Masood Mortazavi <
> masoodmortaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Minimizing GC pauses or minimizing time slots allocated to GC pauses --
>> either through configuration or r
as well with 0.6, heap usage graphs look almost
> identical. The GC is a noticeable bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>
>
>
> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
> *Sen
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
- m.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Hot on the trails of 0.6.0 comes our latest, 0.6.1. This stable point
12 matches
Mail list logo
