rest in committing and maintaining a more heavyweight
> framework to get all the way to serializable cross-partition transactions.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Marek Lewandowski <
> marekmlewandow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> I haven’t
earizable operations
> cross-partition.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7056
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Marek Lewandowski <
> marekmlewandow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> actually I have been also thinking about doing something like redundant
Stupp :
>
> > On 07 Aug 2015, at 14:35, Marek Lewandowski
> wrote:
> >
> > In both of my ideas there
> > is some central piece.
>
>
> That’s the point - a single thing. A single thing IS a
> single-point-of-failure.
> Sorry to reply that drastically: that’s a
ystem and also deals with the problems that arise with
> many 10k clients. Just think of: clients fail/stuck, nodes fail/stuck,
> network gets broken, partitioned, flappy etc etc.
>
> Robert
>
>
> > On 07 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Marek Lewandowski
> wrote:
> >
> &
erest.
What you think about having more heavy transactions?
Does this experiment has sense at all?
regards
--
Marek Lewandowski
