Re: Time for 1.0

2011-01-12 Thread Germán Kondolf
Can I vote with a "+100" ? :) On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:55 -0300, Germán Kondolf wrote: >> Will CQL be included in the 1.0 release? > > CQL 1.0 will be the next release. :) > > -- > Eric Evans > eev.

Re: Time for 1.0

2011-01-12 Thread Germán Kondolf
Will CQL be included in the 1.0 release? // Germán Kondolf http://twitter.com/germanklf http://code.google.com/p/seide/ On 12/01/2011, at 01:29, Eric Evans wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:35 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> Way back in Nov 09, we did a users survey and asked what

Re: Time for 1.0

2011-01-11 Thread Germán Kondolf
+1 days ago I was wondering about the gap between 0.7 and a future 1.0, the answer is just a few more enhancements like you said. :) Excellent news :) // Germán Kondolf http://twitter.com/germanklf http://code.google.com/p/seide/ // @i4 On 11/01/2011, at 22:35, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >

Re: Parallel Compaction

2010-12-18 Thread Germán Kondolf
I've created the patch ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1876 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Germán Kondolf wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Germán Kondolf >> wrote: >> &

Re: Parallel Compaction

2010-12-17 Thread Germán Kondolf
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Germán Kondolf > wrote: > >> Thanks Jonathan for the feedback. >> >> By flush/schema migration you mean the SSTables replace lock? I've put >> that lock just to be su

Re: Parallel Compaction

2010-12-17 Thread Germán Kondolf
i.apache.org/cassandra/CodeStyle, r/m the commented-out sections, > and add a configuration parameter for how many compactions to allow > simultaneously (IMO it mainly only makes sense to have > 1 when you are > running on SSDs, and there's no good way for us to auto-detect that).