Re: [DISCUSS] auto-installing golang in `ant gen-doc` (CASSANDRA-19915)

“ I can only hope they understand and appreciate this *is* their work being carried forward, and our legitimate reasons for the golang to python rewrite (i.e. there's nothing against golang in the community). “ +1 Also, I would love to explore Maxim’s suggestion more. Option 1 still leads to peo

Re: Welcome David Capwell as Cassandra PMC Member!

Congrats!! 🍾 And thank you for everything you do for the project! On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 15:20, Yifan Cai wrote: > Congrats David! > > -- > *From:* Abe Ratnofsky > *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2025 12:11:52 PM > *To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Welcome D

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

I should say that I also haven’t thought of JDK versions when I voted here. Also, I thought we had separate discussion about them - that we want to keep up possibly with the last two LTS versions. Currently we do not have vision on when will be the next release date, so I cannot personally align JD

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

I think there is no reason to deprecate 17 in 5.0? I’d think we would deprecate at some point 11 in 5.0, (once the community is confident in 17 being prod ready.) We commit 21 in 6.0 with the plan to remove 11 and switch to 17 builds in 6.0. Any other thoughts? Points of view? On Wed, 23 Apr 202

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 I also remember we agreed on Discuss thread for removing anything plus preference for backward compatibility wherever it is possible. On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 7:00, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: > +1 > > > On 17 Apr 2025, at 16:58, Josh McKenzie wrote: > > > > [DISCUSS] thread: > https://lists.apach

Re: CEP-15 Update

I think you awesome guys added so much additional testing that probably now Jenkins can’t keep up 🤣 Seems like some CI jobs timed out while still running tests after Accord got merged 😀 Jokes aside, awesome work! Huge congratulations to all the people involved! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Thank you all!! On Fri, 18 A

Re: [DISCUSS] slack notifications for subprojects

I’d say we mimic the current CASSANDRA tickets handling plus adding to the #cassandra-sidecar. That means: 1) Open and close notifications to #cassandra-dev and #cassandra-sidecar 2) all other notifications to #cassandra-noise WDYT? On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 15:48, Josh McKenzie wrote: > Currently

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.1 should be 6.0

+1 on calling it 6.0. I assume JDK 21 may lead to removal of JDK 11 which is breaking change (people need to upgrade to the common JDK version - 17 before upgrading to the next release) On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 14:40, Štefan Miklošovič wrote: > +1, I am also getting questions about the versioning

Re: Huge NetApp donation of hardware for ci-cassandra

Thanks a lot! Truly appreciate it! On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 18:27, Paulo Motta wrote: > As an exclusive user of ci-cassandra.a.o I'm very grateful for this > donation. 🙏 > > I never got circle-ci to work on my machine 🥲😉 > > Thanks all for making this happen! > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 12:51 Mick

Re: Welcome Ekaterina Dimitrova as Cassandra PMC member

Thank you all for the kind words here and some of you reached out in Slack, thank you for the warm welcome! On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 22:43, Tolbert, Andy wrote: > Congratulations Ekaterina!! > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:52 PM Jordan West wrote: > >> Congratulations!!! >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 07:

Re: Welcome Aaron Ploetz as Cassandra Committer

Congrats!!! 🎉 On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 6:11, Josh McKenzie wrote: > Congrats Aaron! > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 4:08 AM, Soheil Rahsaz wrote: > > Congratulations Aaron! > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 12:09 PM Paulo Motta wrote: > > Congratulations Aaron, happy to see you recognized as a committer! > >

Re: Welcome Bernardo Botella as Cassandra Committer

Congratulations!! 🎉 On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 6:15, Josh McKenzie wrote: > Congrats Bernardo - it's been great collaborating with you thus far and > looking forward to more! > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 4:13 AM, Paulo Motta wrote: > > ¡Felicitaciones Bernardo! Well deserved! > > Cheers, > > Paulo > >

Re: Welcome Caleb Rackliffe to the PMC

That’s awesome addition! Well done! Thanks for everything, Caleb!! Congrats!!! On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 18:55, Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > Congrats Caleb! > > On Feb 20, 2025 at 4:06:19 PM, Jon Haddad wrote: > >> The PMC for Apache Cassandra is delighted to announce that Caleb >> Rackliffe has joine

Re: New committers: Maxwell Guo and Dmitry Konstantinov

Congratulations 👏🏻🍾 On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 13:16, Yifan Cai wrote: > Congratulations to both of you! > -- > *From:* Bernardo Botella > *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2025 9:55:05 AM > *To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: New committers: Maxwell Guo and Dm

Re: Welcome Jeremiah Jordan to the PMC

Congrats!! Well deserved! Thank you for all you do and I really appreciate how much you always help everyone, sharing your broad knowledge and expertise! Cheers On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 9:36, Brandon Williams wrote: > Congratulations Jeremiah! > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025

Re: [DISCUSS] synchronisation of properties between Config.java and cassandra.yaml

Same understanding here - the goal of property being presented in Config but not cassandra.yaml was to keep those hidden from regular users aka - advanced config. Also, in some cases I was told some of those did not have a clear recommendation yet how to use them, one more reason to be hidden. I t

Re: Patrick McFadin joins the PMC

Congratulations, Patrick 🎉 On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 11:05, Jordan West wrote: > The PMC's members are pleased to announce that Patrick McFadin has accepted > an invitation to become a PMC member. > > Thanks a lot, Patrick, for everything you have done for the project all > these years. > > Congrat

Re: [DISCUSS] Review Guide for the project

Having updated guides is great and probably we can also put links to them into the PR template, for convenience sake. Thus anyone who opens a PR will see them. On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 18:46, Jordan West wrote: > I generally support a guide we can point new contributors to as well. > > Jordan > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Bracing style on trunk

yself, so this is why I'm not a +1. > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions > > > > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 12:32 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova < > e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I also do not see huge benefit in s

Re: [DISCUSS] Bracing style on trunk

I also do not see huge benefit in switching the style, honestly. And I see risks more than benefits. I also share Blake’s opinion that this would be more suitable for a new project. On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:27, Blake Eggleston wrote: > I lean pretty strongly towards -1 on this. If we were star

Re: Checkstyle as style contract for Cassandra

I agree with you on the second one that it seems more like a preference. The first one is indeed a rule and I appreciate it that you want to add a rule and fix any places where we already fail it. I think the more we automate such kind of things the better. Thanks again for bringing it in. Best

Re: [DISCUSS] Index selection syntax for CASSANDRA-18112

Naming is hard but to me providing what Caleb mentioned through something like WITH OPTIONS sounds reasonable. Thanks for bringing it up. On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 at 2:46, Joel Shepherd wrote: > WITH INDEX (or something equivalent) seems really useful. > > Less opinionated on the specific syntax, but

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.1 should be 6.0

6.0 even just for the reasons Brandon mentioned sounds reasonable to me. And I acknowledge there are more On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 13:10, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > This is another topic we basically revisit afresh every time :) > > I think it’s fine to bump for marketing or vibe reasons, I w

Re: [DISCUSS] Experimental flagging (fork from Re-evaluate compaction defaults in 5.1/trunk)

What JD and Josh said resonates also with the thoughts I had. On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 12:46, Caleb Rackliffe wrote: > +1 to Josh's refinement of JD's proposal > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:42 AM Josh McKenzie > wrote: > >> +1 to this classification with one addition. I think we need to augment

Re: [DISCUSS] Experimental flagging (fork from Re-evaluate compaction defaults in 5.1/trunk)

Hey Jon, The following quick test shows me that vector search is marked as experimental (it is just not in cassandra.yaml as materialized views, etc) cqlsh:k> CREATE TABLE t (pk int, str_val text, val vector, PRIMARY KEY(pk)); cqlsh:k> CREATE CUSTOM INDEX ON t(val) USING 'StorageAttachedIndex';

Re: [VOTE] CEP-37: Repair scheduling inside C*

+1 On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 at 15:56, Sumanth Pasupuleti < sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (nb) > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 12:43 PM Joseph Lynch > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 10:42 PM Jordan West wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:15 Chris Lohfink wrote:

Re: [VOTE] CEP-43: Apache Cassandra CREATE TABLE LIKE

+1 On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 13:52, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > +1 > > Le ven. 8 nov. 2024 à 18:31, Yifan Cai a écrit : > >> +1 (nb) >> >> - Yifan >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM guo Maxwell wrote: >> >>> Thanks Stefan and Dinesh. Let's wait a little longer. >>> >>> >>> Dinesh Joshi 于2024年11月7日

Re: [DISCUSS] Modeling JIRA fix version for subprojects

Honestly, counting the letters was also a thing that happened to me but I should admit that even with CASSANDRAANALYTICS we count the As… My preference is CASSX Seems shorter and less painful to read to me as a user. Thanks On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 11:18, Patrick McFadin wrote: > CASS + NAM

Re: [DISCUSS] Modeling JIRA fix version for subprojects

It would have been nice to be in red italic but… :-) Thanks, Brandon, +1 to the suggestion on my end too. Sounds reasonable to me On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 17:50, Abe Ratnofsky wrote: > +1 to CASSDRIVER-JAVA et al. > > On Oct 17, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Jon Haddad wrote: > > Sgtm, let’s ship it > > +

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0.2

+1 On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 0:46, David Capwell wrote: > +1 > > > On Oct 16, 2024, at 2:45 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:19 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 5.0.2 for release. >> >> sha1: f278f6774fc76465c182041e081982105c3e7dbb

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-13704 Safer handling of out of range tokens

I agree we should be precise in the docs after people share their opinion and experience in this thread and the ticket work gets settled. Thank you Caleb for opening it! It is important On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 15:49, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > Yes, and my usage of CL.*ONE wasn't so correct (as writ

Re: Welcome Chris Bannister, James Hartig, Jackson Flemming and João Reis, as cassandra-gocql-driver committers

Congratulations! 👏🏻 On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 12:43, Patrick McFadin wrote: > And the gocql users everywhere are high-fiving and taking the rest of the > day off to celebrate. Congrats everyone! > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:18 AM Bernardo Botella < > conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote: > >> It is

Re: Welcome Jordan West and Stefan Miklosovic as Cassandra PMC members!

Great news indeed! 👏🏻 Congrats!! On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 16:35, Bernardo Botella wrote: > Congrats you both! > > > On Aug 30, 2024, at 1:32 PM, Melissa Logan wrote: > > Great news - congrats Jordan and Stefan! > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 1:31 PM Sumanth Pasupuleti < > sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail

Re: Welcome Doug Rohrer as Cassandra Committer

Congrats, Doug! 🥳 On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 14:57, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > The Apache Cassandra PMC is thrilled to announce that Doug Rohrer has > accepted the invitation to become a committer! > > Doug has worked on several aspects of Cassandra, Sidecar, and > Analytics. Congratulations and welcome!

Re: Welcome Joey Lynch as Cassandra PMC member

Great news!! Congrats Joey!! Well deserved! On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 10:36, C. Scott Andreas wrote: > Congratulations Joey! > > - Scott > > — > Mobile > > > On Jul 24, 2024, at 7:12 AM, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > >  > > The PMC's members are pleased to announce that Joey Lynch has accepted > th

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] GoCQL driver

+1 On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 6:14, Jon Haddad wrote: > +1. > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:50 AM J. D. Jordan > wrote: > >> +1 nb. Good to see this heavily used driver get continued development in >> the project. >> >> > On Jun 25, 2024, at 5:29 PM, Michael Shuler >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >

Re: Cassandra PMC Chair Rotation, 2024 Edition

Thank you, Josh, and congrats, Dinesh! 🥳 On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 19:44, Joseph Lynch wrote: > This is exciting news!! > > Congratulations Dinesh and thank you for taking on this role! Also thank > you to Josh for taking the role this year! > > -Joey > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:39 PM Rahul Xav

Re: [DISCUSS] LWT conditions behavior on collections is inconsistent (CASSANDRA-19637)

Hey Benjamin, Thanks for the fix and raising the point here. The patch seems reasonable to me. The only thing to confirm on my mind is whether people consider it behavior breaking change or only a bug fix. Based on that we can move forward with patch for 4.0+ or only trunk. It will be also good t

Re: [DISCUSS] Stream Pipelines on hot paths

+1 to ban them, considering we also do not have any regular performance testing as part of the project test suites. Jacek has a good point about the checkstyle - there is separate one for tests. Though I would not object if people want them banned from tests too. I guess if we ban them this would

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding support for BETWEEN operator

I second Patrick about the parties and all that… Thanks, Simon for all your work! I am excited to see what’s next from you as I am sure it will be awesome! Cheers! On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 14:50, Jon Haddad wrote: > Benjamin, I’m +1 on adding BETWEEN, thanks for bringing this up. > > To all, my i

Re: discuss: add to_human_size function

BYTES to GIBIBYTES and respective methods on them which convert from >> that unit to whatever else. Is this OK to be used for the purposes of this >> feature? I would expect that once we have units like these and methods on >> them to convert from-to, it can be reused in where

Re: discuss: add to_human_size function

; looks like. > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:36 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >> Quick comment: >> >> DataRateSpec, DataStorageSpec, or DurationSpec >> - we intentionally do not support going smaller to bigger size in those >> classes which are specific

Re: discuss: add to_human_size function

Edit: I meant to say smaller to bigger unit, not size, sorry On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 6:35, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Quick comment: > > DataRateSpec, DataStorageSpec, or DurationSpec > - we intentionally do not support going smaller to bigger size in those > classes which a

Re: discuss: add to_human_size function

Quick comment: DataRateSpec, DataStorageSpec, or DurationSpec - we intentionally do not support going smaller to bigger size in those classes which are specific for cassandra.yaml - precision issues. Please keep it that way. That is why the notion of min unit was added in cassandra.yaml for parame

Re: Welcome Alexandre Dutra, Andrew Tolbert, Bret McGuire, Olivier Michallat as Cassandra Committers

Congrats and thank you for all your work on the drivers! On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 13:17, Francisco Guerrero wrote: > Congratulations everyone! > > On 2024/04/17 17:14:34 Abe Ratnofsky wrote: > > Congrats everyone! > > > > > On Apr 17, 2024, at 1:10 PM, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > > > > The Apache

Re: Default table compression defined in yaml.

Any new settings are expected to be added in the new format On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 5:52, Bowen Song via dev wrote: > I believe the `foobar_in_kb: 123` format in the cassandra.yaml file is > deprecated, and the new format is `foobar: 123KiB`. Is there a need to > introduce new settings entries wi

Re: Welcome Brad Schoening as Cassandra Committer

Congrats and thank you for everything, Brad! 🥳 On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 15:46, Josh McKenzie wrote: > The Apache Cassandra PMC is pleased to announce that Brad Schoening has > accepted > the invitation to become a committer. > > Your work on the integrated python driver, launch script environment,

Re: [Discuss] "Latest" configuration for testing and evaluation (CASSANDRA-18753)

Thanks for opening an epic @Jacek. It seems the dtest_offheap job is replaced by dtest_latest which means we will have the same amount of jobs after the current ticket and I am not worried about Jenkins. Though in CircleCI we did not have the dtest_offheap job mandatory run pre-commit but as far

Re: [Discuss] "Latest" configuration for testing and evaluation (CASSANDRA-18753)

> > Perhaps this was needed during j17 stabilization but is no longer required? No, I only switched from tests running J8+J11 to tests running J11+J17. What we tested was something decided in the 4.0 era when JDK11 was added, and I was not even part of the community yet :-) > Any known java-relat

Re: [Discuss] "Latest" configuration for testing and evaluation (CASSANDRA-18753)

> > I'm ok with breaking trunk CI temporarily as long as failures are tracked > and triaged/addressed before the next release. >From the ticket, I understand it is meant for 5.0-rc I share this sentiment for the release we decide to ship with: > The failures should block release or we should no

Re: Welcome Maxim Muzafarov as Cassandra Committer

Congrats, Maxim! Well deserved! Thank you for everything! On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 13:26, Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > Congrats Maxim! Thanks for all of your contributions! > > On Jan 8, 2024 at 12:19:04 PM, Josh McKenzie wrote: > >> The Apache Cassandra PMC is pleased to announce that Maxim Muzafaro

Re: Welcome Mike Adamson as Cassandra committer

Great news! Congrats, Mike!! Thank you for all your hard work!!! On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 9:55, Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > Congrats Mike! Thanks for all your work on SAI and Vector index. Well > deserved! > > On Dec 8, 2023 at 8:52:07 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > >> Congratulations Mike! >> >> Ki

Re: Pre-commit (devbranch) ci-cassandra.a.o on 5.0 and trunk unavailable

Jenkins Trunk is also not running post commit at the moment - pending https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19083 On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 3:38, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > For broader awareness. > > The debranch job on ci-cassandra.a.o: that used for pre-commit testing; is > currently no

Re: [DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

Thanks, Mick It seems that no one had objections to your suggestion so I will move forward with that: “I suggest, for expediency, to - put a nice failure message in Sjk.java (e.g. "JDK required for this nodetool command"), - add a comment in cassandra.yaml in front of audit_logging_options stati

Re: CEP-21 - Transactional cluster metadata merged to trunk

I hate to say it, but I was disappointed that this email thread was started after the TCM work had already been committed. Especially knowing how we had even an epic with patches spread around the codebase, which are waiting on TCM to get committed first so that we do not disturb any rebase. The la

Re: Welcome Francisco Guerrero Hernandez as Cassandra Committer

Congrats Francisco! Well deserved ! On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 14:08, J. D. Jordan wrote: > Congrats! > > > On Nov 28, 2023, at 12:57 PM, C. Scott Andreas > wrote: > > > > Congratulations, Francisco! > > > > - Scott > > > >> On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:53 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > >> > >> The PMC mem

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-beta1

“The QA label is part of our version number and that's baked in.” How can we have beta 2, but there is no way for alpha 2? On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 13:55, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 19:27, J. D. Jordan > wrote: > >> That said. This is clearly better than and with many f

Re: [DISCUSS] Harry in-tree

+1, also, Alex, just an idea - maybe you want to make a virtual talk, as part of the contributors meetings? На понеделник, 27 ноември 2023 г. Yifan Cai написа: > +1 > -- > *发件人:* Sam Tunnicliffe > *发送时间:* Tuesday, November 28, 2023 2:43:51 AM > *收件人:* dev > *主题:* R

[DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-19001 - JRE vs JDK runtime

Hi everyone, Some of you remember that Paulo raised a concern around warnings about missing modules on startup during the 5.0 alpha2 voting.[1] We opened the ticket CASSANDRA-19001. The problem turned out to be not a 5.0 one. Those modules are missing when we run Cassandra on JRE. Those warnings h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-alpha2

1. “No objections from me since these issues are mostly cosmetic, but it would be nice to clear these before the next alpha/beta. I will create a ticket for the unknown module warning later if nobody beats me to it.” 1. 1. CASSANDRA-19001

Re: Road to 5.0-GA (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-alpha2)

Totally agree with the others. Such an issue on its own should be a priority in any release. Looking forward to the reproduction test mentioned on the ticket. Thanks to Alex for his work on harry! On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 12:47, Benedict wrote: > Alex can confirm but I think it actually turns out

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-alpha2

this topic. On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 21:07, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > Thank you for testing and for raising the issue! > I can confirm I do not use the same JDK as you, and I did not see any > warnings on my machine on startup or when calling nodetool commands. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-alpha2

Hi Paulo, Thank you for testing and for raising the issue! I can confirm I do not use the same JDK as you, and I did not see any warnings on my machine on startup or when calling nodetool commands. I believe on a quick check that jdk.attach was needed for nodetool sjk. (It was mentioned on CASSAN

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

Benedict, what is your expectation for stabilization time? And what is the suggestion for the patches Benjamin mentioned, which are on their way to land in trunk? (Or any other patch on its way to be merged) On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 8:20, Benedict wrote: > The time to stabilise is orthogonal to th

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

Hi everyone, Thanks, Mick, for raising the topic. I support having released 5.0 without waiting on Accord and TCM as previously discussed here. (we are almost November, and the features are not ready. The currently committed set is glamorous in its own way :-) )https://lists.apache.org/thread/9c5c

Re: Development Dependencies documentation.

Hi Claude, You are not wrong. Unfortunately, it is outdated. Abe Ratnofsky has a work in progress patch. You might want to get in touch with him to finish it. Best regards, Ekaterina On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 8:04, Claude Warren, Jr via dev < dev@cassandra.apache.org> wrote: > I just had to change d

Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

+1 on removal the whole lib if we are sure we don’t need it. Nothing better than some healthy house cleaning -1 on partial removals On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:34, David Capwell wrote: > +1 to drop the whole lib… > > > On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:55 AM, Jeremiah Jordan > wrote: > > Agreed. -1 on sel

Re: [DISCUSS] putting versions into Deprecated annotations

I’ve been told in the past not to remove public methods in a patch release though. On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 8:03, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > Could you point me some document / ML thread this was explicitly decided >> in if you know of anything like that? It would be great if there was some >> solid g

Re: [VOTE] Accept java-driver

+1(nb), thank you for making it happen! На вторник, 3 октомври 2023 г. Dinesh Joshi написа: > +1 > > This is great for the project. Thank you for all the hard work everyone > put into this! It has been a long journey to get to this point. > > Dinesh > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 9:53 PM, Mick Semb Weve

Re: [DISCUSS] Add JVector as a dependency for CEP-30

For my understanding, isn’t it gonna be an issue to be copyrighted also to a single person? For the same reasons? On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 at 7:59, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > Just for my understanding on this. Is the issue that the code has a >> copyright header on it or that it is copyright to a c

Re: [DISCUSS] Backport CASSANDRA-18816 to 5.0? Add support for repair coordinator to retry messages that timeout

+1 from me too. Moreover, this work has started as part of the test efforts and identifying weak points during the 4.0 testing, if I recall correctly. 5.0 sounds like a good place to land. Thank you David and everyone else involved for your efforts! On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 at 1:01, Berenguer Blasi wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Addition of smile-nlp test dependency for CEP-30

Jeff, isn’t this ok as long as it is used only in tests? If we are not sure we can open a Jira to legal? On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 12:23, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > Just to be clear - this repo? > https://github.com/haifengl/smile/blob/master/LICENSE > > That shows GPL + Commercial? > > > > On Wed, Sep 13

Re: [DISCUSS] Update default disk_access_mode to mmap_index_only on 5.0

Thanks for starting this discussion, Paulo! Shall we also share this thread with @user? On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 at 16:35, C. Scott Andreas wrote: > Supportive of switching the default to mmap_index_only as well. > > I don’t have numbers handy to share, but my experience has been > significantly lowe

Re: [DISCUSSION] Dependency management in our first alpha release

/issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18799 > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 18:39, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > > > > Thank you all. We are going to continue with those tickets and related > problems then. > > > > On Maxim's question: > > "Do we need

Re: [DISCUSSION] Dependency management in our first alpha release

config > will have a path forward if they need similar functionality. > > On Aug 23, 2023, at 07:28, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > > I also want to hear if Abe still has concerns about not following > deprecation process here. > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

avadocs as errorneous. > > There are other checkboxes as well. I am not saying it solves it all but > there is some room for tweaking this if one wishes. > > ____ > From: Ekaterina Dimitrova > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 20:05 > To: dev@ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-alpha1

+1 On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 11:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 5.0-alpha1 for release. > > DISCLAIMER, this alpha release does not contain the expected 5.0 > features: Vector Search (CEP-30), Transactional Cluster Metadata > (CEP-21) and Accord Transactions (CE

[DISCUSSION] Dependency management in our first alpha release

Hi everyone, I wanted to clarify something. I understood dependency updates/cleaning can also be done in an alpha release if they lead to minimal user-facing changes, if any at all. I agree with that in our first 5.0 alpha release because we are not yet feature-complete. It is a good time for peop

[DISCUSSION] News and announcements, help needed

Hey friends, The 5.0 alpha test build is out for testing! Great! Did you also have the chance to attend any of the latest town halls? Ok, it is time to say where I am going with this short intro... Our friends from Constantia are working hard to help us spread the news and promote all the great wo

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

push it through On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 12:46, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > +1 to `ant check` (and to failing on it). > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 18:43, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >> Agreed with Maxim. If we fail CI on the javadoc task, in my opinion it >> should be

[DISCUSSION] CASSANDRA-18772 - removal of commons-codec on trunk

Hi everyone, I propose we remove commons-codec on trunk. The only usage I found was from CASSANDRA-12790 * - *Support InfluxDb metrics reporter configuration, which relied on commons-codec and metrics-reporter-config, which will be removed as

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

should fail if it regresses so > > we can keep it this way. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Brandon > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:49 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova > > wrote: > > > > > > In CASSANDRA-18717 Maxim posted the javadoc fix. Stefan already

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

ation makes sense. Could even add them to > our site with something like an "API" section (gasp) here: > https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/. > > Would certainly help motivate us to clarify the whole "what is an external > API we're committing to or n

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-18743 Deprecation of metrics-reporter-config

“ The rationale for this proposed deprecation is that the upcoming 5.0 release is a good time to evaluate dependencies that are no longer receiving updates and will become risks in the future.” Thank you for raising it, I support your proposal for deprecation On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 8:55, Abe Ratn

Re: Timing of the last releases of Cassandra 3.0.x / 3.11.x

I agree, we have enough for a release of 3.0 and 3.11 and if there are users expecting it, I don’t see a reason why not to cut releases. Shall we do it together with 5.0 alpha? There was a mention that one might be cut soon, as far as I recall. Just thinking it might be easier to do the releases al

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a 5.0 landing page

n case someone missed it. > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, at 4:21 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > > > Hi Hugh, > > Thank you for reaching out. I think this is a great idea. Also, great > timing, considering the community is discussing a potential 5.0 alpha > release soon. > > It

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...Mmuzaf:cassandra:javadoc_build > > On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 21:20, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > > > > Thank you Maxim, > > > > “ > > > > From my point of > > view, the problem is that the javadoc task is not given

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a 5.0 landing page

Hi Hugh, Thank you for reaching out. I think this is a great idea. Also, great timing, considering the community is discussing a potential 5.0 alpha release soon. It seems to me you actually suggest more than one page? 1) 5.0 and new features - could this be an update of the What’s new page? - ht

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

gt; >>> most people are not looking at Javadoc when working on the codebase. > >>> I definitely use it extensively inside the IDE. But never as a > compiled set of external docs. > >>> > >>> Which is to say, I'm +1 on removing the target and I'd ask everyo

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding BountyCastle as a test dependency

As it seems there are no objections, we will continue with the addition of this dependency, thank you On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 11:41, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Hi team, > Probably most of you noticed that SSLFactoryTest unit tests fail now with > JDK 17. Java 15 removed sun.secu

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

odebase. > > Cheers, > > Derek > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:11 AM Brandon Williams wrote: > > I don't think even if it works anyone is going to use the output, so > I'm good with removal. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:

[DISCUSSION] Shall we remove ant javadoc task?

Hi everyone, We were looking into a user report around our ant javadoc task recently. That made us realize it is not run in CI; it finishes successfully even if there are hundreds of errors, some potentially breaking doc pages. There was a ticket discussion where a few community members mentioned

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Expect failures today. Dropping JDK 8 and adding JDK 11

As there were no objections from the community I closed CASSANDRA-18701 On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 16:22, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > >> FYI, devbranch (pre-commit) on ci-cassandra.a.o is hardcoded to build on >> jdk8 and jdk11 >> so it's not going to work with trunk based patches… >> >> I'll revi

[DISCUSSION] Adding BountyCastle as a test dependency

Hi team, Probably most of you noticed that SSLFactoryTest unit tests fail now with JDK 17. Java 15 removed sun.security.x509 package. You can still generate a Self-Signed certificate using BouncyCastle by adding it to the classpath, described in this issue

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Expect failures today. Dropping JDK 8 and adding JDK 11

CASSANDRA-18701 On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 13:10, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > It seems there was some misunderstanding as dev-branch was on the list of > tasks to be fixed here. > > Anyway, I will work on a patch as I do not want to block people who are > using it, thanks. My under

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Expect failures today. Dropping JDK 8 and adding JDK 11

It seems there was some misunderstanding as dev-branch was on the list of tasks to be fixed here. Anyway, I will work on a patch as I do not want to block people who are using it, thanks. My understanding from a private conversation is that CASSANDRA-18594 might land in August-September so I don’t

Re: August 5.0 Freeze (with waivers…) and a 5.0-alpha1

+1 on freeze 1st August with the suggested waiver. Also, +1 on the idea for alpha 1, as long as we give straight upfront the right expectations to users. Now, when we added also JDK17 in CI, I want to encourage people to start testing it in their test environments and give us some feedback. On

Re: Status Update on CEP-7 Storage Attached Indexes (SAI)

Thanks Caleb! Great job everyone! 🚀👏🏻 On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 15:07, J. D. Jordan wrote: > Thanks for all the work here! > > On Jul 26, 2023, at 1:57 PM, Caleb Rackliffe > wrote: > >  > > Alright, the cep-7-sai branch is now merged to trunk! > > Now we move to addressing the most urgent items

Re: Java distributed upgrade tests fail and issue with CircleCI generate.sh script

Upgrade tests fixed, please rebase your branches on latest trunk On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 13:03, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > 1 of 2 is resolved. > The CircleCI script is fixed, you might want to rebase trunk. > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: >

Re: Java distributed upgrade tests fail and issue with CircleCI generate.sh script

1 of 2 is resolved. The CircleCI script is fixed, you might want to rebase trunk. On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 12:05, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Hi all, > All java distributed upgrade tests fail at the moment. > Testing a potential fix in CASSANDRA-18690. > Apologize for the issue.

  1   2   3   4   5   >