Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-50: Authentication Negotiation

On 7/8/2025 8:22 AM, Abe Ratnofsky wrote: +1 (nb) from me as well. Would be nice to have a reference implementation of negotiated authentication in the Java driver; I’d happy to collaborate on that. I'd love some help with the driver[s]. I plan to do at least "an" implementation in the Java

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-50: Authentication Negotiation

I've updated the CEP with a lot of your suggestions below. One thing I'm holding off on is making "requiresAuthentication" a JMX-controllable ("hot") property. I do like the idea of being able to enable it without bouncing nodes. However, I'm concerned about config updates made through JMX not

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-50: Authentication Negotiation

> ... so that in the future new options could just be keys in the multimap, > which would not be considered a protocol change? Or placing all the options > -- current and future -- into the multimap? The former. Trying to think through defensive postures on the protocol to prevent future changes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra GoCQL Driver 2.0.0-rc1 (2nd attempt)

+1 On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 4:27 PM Jackson Fleming wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:53 AM Maxim Muzafarov > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 16:44, guo Maxwell wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Brandon Williams 于2025年7月9日 周三下午9:50写道： >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] introduction of nodetool get/set guardrailsconfig in 4.1, 5.0 and trunk

> Is it OK for the community if we added nodetool get/set guardrailsconfig commands to 4.1, 5.0 and trunk? Then, under (4), the CQL approach would be delivered as well. This seems non-controversial and the only reason it was not done before release (to the best of my knowledge) is the hope that u

Re: [DISCUSS] introduction of nodetool get/set guardrailsconfig in 4.1, 5.0 and trunk

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 6:20 AM Štefan Miklošovič wrote: > Is it OK for the community if we added nodetool get/set guardrailsconfig > commands to 4.1, 5.0 and trunk? Then, under (4), the CQL approach would be > delivered as well. I am struggling to find a scenario where it wouldn't be ok to add

[DISCUSS] introduction of nodetool get/set guardrailsconfig in 4.1, 5.0 and trunk

There is (1) which attempts to add guardrails get/set configuration to nodetool. When first encountered, I suggested that we might do a CQL vtable approach instead. This is still not done and Paulo asked if the nodetool approach could not be still added to 5.0 (2) The justification is that we ha

Missing 4.1.9 documentation

Good Morning all, It has been pointed out to me that the documentation for 4.1.9 is missing from the website ( https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/ ), does anyone know why this is? Looking at the list of changes for 4.1.9, I guess there were not many, if any,