Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-48: First-Class Materialized View Support

Sorry, Blake—I was traveling last week and couldn’t reply to your email sooner. > First - we interpret view data with higher timestamps than the base table as data that’s missing from the base and replicate it into the base table. The timestamp of the missing data may be below the paxos timestamp

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Clarifying our JDK Support Policy

To close the loop: I added a new top level page in our wiki on Governance and Operations with some links to ASF policy docs that will hopefully be helpful: link . I've added a page under that hierarchy for

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSSIDECAR-254 - Enabling sidecar to collect async profiles

> If sidecar wishes to expose exec and take the fact that this API could break > on it, I am +0 to that. I mostly am trying to highlight the risk Trying to disambiguate here. "This API": we referring to our friendly simple exposed subset? Or are we referring to "you passed --raw and whatever is