Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-46 Finish Transient Replication/Witnesses

2025-05-04 Thread Jordan West
I’m generally supportive. The concept is one that I can see the benefits of and I also think the current implementation adds a lot of complexity to the codebase for being stuck in experimental mode. It will be great to have a more robust version built on a better approach. On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 0

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-46 Finish Transient Replication/Witnesses

2025-05-04 Thread Benedict
+1 This is an obviously good feature for operators that are storage-bound in multi-DC deployments but want to retain their latency characteristics during node maintenance. Log replicas are the right approach. > On 3 May 2025, at 23:42, sc...@paradoxica.net wrote: > > Hey everybody, bumping th