Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On 26/5/23 6:07, guo Maxwell wrote: +1 Dinesh Joshi 于2023年5月26日 周五上午11:08写道： +1 On May 25, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:  Let's make this official. CEP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

+1 On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 05:12:45PM +0200, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.2 for release. > > sha1: c5c075f0080f3f499d2b01ffb155f89723076285 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.1.2-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/cont

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

+1 On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.10 for release. > > sha1: da77d3f729160e84fbab37666de99550be794265 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.0.10-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

+1 On 25/5/23 22:12, Mick Semb Wever wrote: The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. +1 Check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

+1 On 25/5/23 21:57, Mick Semb Wever wrote: The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. +1 Check

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 Dinesh Joshi 于2023年5月26日 周五上午11:08写道： > +1 > > > On May 25, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >  > > Let's make this official. > > CEP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-Attached+Indexes >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1On May 25, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:Let's make this official.CEP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-Attached+IndexesPOC that demonstrates all the big rocks, including distributed queries:

Re: [CASSANDRA-11471] Authentication mechanism negotiation (OPTIONS/SUPPORTED)

Leaving the naming aside (the hardest part of any software), I am generally positive about your idea. A protocol version bump may be avoidable like you suggested. Perhaps a prototype of this idea is in order to help shape the idea? Would you like to take it on? > On May 21, 2023, at 4:21 AM, De

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 nbOn May 25, 2023, at 7:47 PM, Jasonstack Zhao Yang wrote:+1On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 8:44 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: +1 From: Josh McKenzie Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 5:37:02 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 8:44 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > +1 > -- > *From:* Josh McKenzie > *Sent:* Thursday, May 25, 2023 5:37:02 PM > *To:* dev > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search > > +1 > > On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 8:33 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 From: Josh McKenzie Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 5:37:02 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search +1 On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 8:33 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: +1 On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:45 AM Jonathan Ellis mailto:jbel...@gmail.com>> wrote: Le

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 8:33 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:45 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> Let's make this official. >> >> CEP: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-At

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:45 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Let's make this official. > > CEP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-Attached+Indexes > > POC that demonstrates all the big rocks, including

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 > On May 25, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 16:46, Brandon Williams > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Kind Regards, >> Brandon >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:45 AM Jonathan Ellis > > wrote: >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 16:46, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:45 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > > Let's make this official. > > > > CEP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28AN

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 Kind Regards, Brandon On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:45 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > Let's make this official. > > CEP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-Attached+Indexes > > POC that demonstrates all

Re: Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+ 1 I am seeing ANN Vector Search pop up in every database... From: Patrick McFadin Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 11:29 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search +1 Love the buzz this creating with new users. Thanks f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. +1 Checked - signing correct - checksums are correct - source a

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Nope, my awareness of Agrona predates Branimir’s proposal, as does others. Aleksey intended to propose its inclusion beforehand also.If all we’re getting is lock striping, do we really need a separate library?On 25 May 2023, at 19:33, Jonathan Ellis wrote:Let's not fall prey to status quo bias, n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > +1 Checked - signing correct - checksums are correct - source

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Fair enough. Yes, my thought was if we're going to use fastutils concurrent we might as well use them for single threaded use cases rather than having both floating around, but, if we're in love with Agrona buffers I'm fine with both. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:29 AM David Capwell wrote: > Agro

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Let's not fall prey to status quo bias, nobody performed an exhaustive analysis of agrona in November. If Branimir had proposed fastutils at the time that's what we'd be using today. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:50 AM Benedict wrote: > Given they provide no data or explanation, and that benchma

Re: [VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

+1 Love the buzz this creating with new users. Thanks for the work on this Jonathan. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:45 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Let's make this official. > > CEP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+vi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

+1 On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:14 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.2 for release. > > sha1: c5c075f0080f3f499d2b01ffb155f89723076285 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.1.2-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

I'm seeing a few distinct topics here: 1. Harry's adoption and approachability I agree that approachability is one of Harry's main improvement areas right now. If our goal is to produce a fuzz testing framework for the Cassandra project, then adoption by contributors and usage for new feature d

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

I’m far less inclined to take that approach to fundamental libraries, where quality is far more important than presentation.On 25 May 2023, at 17:29, David Capwell wrote:Agrona isn’t going anywhere due to the library being more than basic collections.Now, with regard to single-threaded collection

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Agrona isn’t going anywhere due to the library being more than basic collections. Now, with regard to single-threaded collections… honestly I dislike Agrona as I always fight to avoid boxing; carrot was far better with this regard…. Didn’t look at the fastutil versions to see if they are better

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Given they provide no data or explanation, and that benchmarking is hard, I’m not inclined to give much weight to their analysis.Agrona was favoured in large part due to the perceived quality of the library. I’m not inclined to swap it out without proper evidence the fastutils is both materially fa

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

There's about a dozen uses of agrona so far, plus a few more in test code, almost all of which are SAI. Porting over won't be hard. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:33 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > On May 25, 2023, at 6:14 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > > Any objections to adding the concurrent wrappe

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.15

With 5 +1s and no -1s, the vote passes. Thanks everybody. > On May 24, 2023, at 9:58 AM, Jon Meredith wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM Francisco Guerrero > wrote: >> +1 (nb) >> >> On 2023/05/24 15:38:54 Alex Petrov wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed,

[VOTE] CEP-30 ANN Vector Search

Let's make this official. CEP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-30%3A+Approximate+Nearest+Neighbor%28ANN%29+Vector+Search+via+Storage-Attached+Indexes POC that demonstrates all the big rocks, including distributed queries: https://github.com/datastax/cassandra/tree/cep-vs

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Try it out and see, the only data point I have is that the company who has spent more effort here than anyone else I could find likes fastutil better. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:33 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > On May 25, 2023, at 6:14 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > > Any objections to adding the

Re: Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

> On May 25, 2023, at 6:14 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > Any objections to adding the concurrent wrapper and switching out agrona for > fastutil? How does fastutil compare to agrona in terms of memory profile and runtime performance? How invasive would it be to switch?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

+1nb > On May 25, 2023, at 10:12 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.2 for release. > > sha1: c5c075f0080f3f499d2b01ffb155f89723076285 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.1.2-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

+1nb > On May 25, 2023, at 10:14 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:13 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.10 for release. >> >> sha1: da77d3f729160e84fbab37666de99550be794265 >> Git: https://gi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

+1 Kind Regards, Brandon On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:13 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.10 for release. > > sha1: da77d3f729160e84fbab37666de99550be794265 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.0.10-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://reposit

[VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.2 for release. sha1: c5c075f0080f3f499d2b01ffb155f89723076285 Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.1.2-tentative Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1302/org/apache/cassandra/cassandra-all/4.1.2

[VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.10 for release. sha1: da77d3f729160e84fbab37666de99550be794265 Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.0.10-tentative Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1299/org/apache/cassandra/cassandra-all/4.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

> I would really like us to split out utilities into a common project +1 to the sentiment. Would also advocate strongly for it being more tightly integrated with the base project than what we've been doing with our ecosystem (i.e. completely separate projects, not submodules), mostly from a disc

Agrona vs fastutil and fastutil-concurrent-wrapper

Hi all, We've been using agrona for almost a year and it's a huge improvement over boxing everything. But it's limited to single thread use cases. Fastutil is an alternative that has a concurrent wrapper: https://github.com/vigna/fastutil https://github.com/trivago/fastutil-concurrent-wrapper B

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

This was not a talk, but rather an interactive workshop, unfortunately will not work in a recorded way, but I am trying to work out ways to preserve this. On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 10:26 AM, Claude Warren, Jr via dev wrote: > Since the talk was not accepted for Cassandra Summit, would it be possib

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

I would really like us to split out utilities into a common project, personally. It would be nice to work with a shared palette, including for dtest-api, accord, Harry etc.I think it would help clean up the codebase a bit too, as we have some (minimal) tight coupling with utilities and the C* proce

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

Since the talk was not accepted for Cassandra Summit, would it be possible to record it as a simple youtube video and publish it so that the detailed information about how to use Harry is not lost? On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 7:36 AM Alex Petrov wrote: > While we are at it, we may also want to pull