Re: [POLL] Vector type for ML

2023-05-03 Thread David Capwell
> Did we agree on a CQL syntax? I don’t believe there has been a pool on CQL syntax… my understanding reading all the threads is that there are ~4-5 options and non are -1ed, so believe we are waiting for majority rule on this? > On May 3, 2023, at 1:23 PM, Jeremiah D Jordan wrote: > >> To be

Re: [POLL] Vector type for ML

2023-05-03 Thread Jeremiah D Jordan
> To be clear, I support the general agreement David and Jonathan seem to have > reached. +1 as well. > On May 3, 2023, at 3:07 PM, Caleb Rackliffe wrote: > > To be clear, I support the general agreement David and Jonathan seem to have > reached. > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:05 PM Caleb Rac

Re: [POLL] Vector type for ML

2023-05-03 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
To be clear, I support the general agreement David and Jonathan seem to have reached. On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:05 PM Caleb Rackliffe wrote: > Did we agree on a CQL syntax? > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:06 PM Rahul Xavier Singh < > rahul.xavier.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I like this approach. Th

Re: [POLL] Vector type for ML

2023-05-03 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
Did we agree on a CQL syntax? On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:06 PM Rahul Xavier Singh < rahul.xavier.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like this approach. Thank you for those working on this vector search > initiative. > > Here's the feedback from my "user" hat for someone who is looking at > databases / ind

Re: [POLL] Vector type for ML

2023-05-03 Thread Rahul Xavier Singh
I like this approach. Thank you for those working on this vector search initiative. Here's the feedback from my "user" hat for someone who is looking at databases / indexes for my next LLM app. Can I take some python code and go from using an in memory vector store like numpy or FAISS to somethin

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-28: Reading and Writing Cassandra Data with Spark Bulk Analytics

2023-05-03 Thread Dinesh Joshi
If there aren't additional questions / comments I will start the VOTE thread on this CEP tonight. On 2023/05/01 19:50:12 Dinesh Joshi wrote: > Does anybody have any questions that we could answer about this proposal?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.15

2023-05-03 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > +1 Checked - signing correct - checksums are correct - source art

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.15

2023-05-03 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 Kind Regards, Brandon On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:38 AM Miklosovic, Stefan wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.15 for release. > > sha1: 6cdcf5e56a77cf40c251125d68856a614eccbc53 > Git: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.15-tentati

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.15

2023-05-03 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
+1 > On 2 May 2023, at 07:37, Miklosovic, Stefan > wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.15 for release. > > sha1: 6cdcf5e56a77cf40c251125d68856a614eccbc53 > Git: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.15-tentative > Maven Artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.15

2023-05-03 Thread Berenguer Blasi
+1 On 2/5/23 8:37, Miklosovic, Stefan wrote: Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.15 for release. sha1: 6cdcf5e56a77cf40c251125d68856a614eccbc53 Git: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.15-tentative Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.o