Can python upgrade tests be ran without -h? Last time I tried iirc they
fail on -m
On 20/10/22 4:11, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
Thank you Josh. Glad to see that our CI is getting more attention. As
no Cassandra feature will be there if we don't do proper testing,
right? Important as all the su
Thank you Josh. Glad to see that our CI is getting more attention. As no
Cassandra feature will be there if we don't do proper testing, right?
Important as all the suites and tools we have. With that being said I am
glad to see Derek is volunteering to spend more time on this as I believe
this is a
> 1. Tune parallelism levels per job (David and Ekaterina have insight on this)
+1 to this! I drastically lower our parallelism as only python-dtest upgrade
tests need many resources…
What I do for JVM unit/jvm-dtest is the following
def java_parallelism(src_dir, kind, num_file_in_worker, incl
1) would be nice to have. The first thing I do is that I change the parallelism
to 20. None of committed config.yaml's are appropriate for our company CircleCI
so I have to tweak this manually. I think we can not run more that 25/30
containers in parallel, something like that. HIGHRES has 100 an
While working w/Andres on CASSANDRA-17939 a variety of things came up regarding
our circleci config and opportunities to improve it. Figured I'd hit the list
up here to see what people's thoughts are since many of us intersect with these
systems daily and having your workflow disrupted without h
One more idea, I was looking to update the What’s new page - a few links to
docs or blog pages and referral to NEWS.txt and CHANGES.txt maybe.
Currently the 4.1 and trunk What’s new pages point to the 4.0 one things
and the config docs only. I will open a ticket later today. That should be
a quick
Welcome Sharan! :)
One of the features that is going to be released in 4.1 is the ability to
add TTL to snapshots, but this hasn't been documented yet afaik.
There's a preliminary documentation patch available on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16887 if you want to take a
stab at
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.7 for release.
sha1: 277fa4fca4a80eb327be6559f993c91e42dd4009
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.7-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1279/org/ap
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.14 for release.
sha1: 9d3327ef1321fe1bf4e7fc73ed6111da7c994553
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.14-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1278/or
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.0.28 for release.
sha1: 96c5332ee15f45ca5410caaa787cc88d6947b3c9
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.28-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1277/org/
Just to clarify, I have no objections to the current plan.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:56 PM Claude Warren, Jr
wrote:
> I am not familiar with the Diagnostics framework but it sounds like it
> would satisfy the need. Thanks for pointing it out. I will dive into it
> to get an understanding of ho
11 matches
Mail list logo
