> What is hard to wrap my head around is how a
given partition can participate in a successful Paxos transaction even if
it might be completely unaware of the previous transaction to the same
partition.
The partition is aware of every prior transaction, but no specific replica is
necessarily awar
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 18.40 bened...@apache.org, wrote:
> > And at the end of the repair, this lower bound is known and stored
> somewhere?
>
> Yes, there is a new system.paxos_repair_history table
>
> > Under good conditions, I assume the result of a paxos repair is that all
> nodes received all L
> And at the end of the repair, this lower bound is known and stored
somewhere?
Yes, there is a new system.paxos_repair_history table
> Under good conditions, I assume the result of a paxos repair is that all
nodes received all LWT transactions from all other replicas?
All in progress LWTs are f
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 1.45 bened...@apache.org, wrote:
> > As the repair is only guaranteed for a majority of replicas, I assume I
> can discover somewhere which replicas are up to date like this?
>
> I’m not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean which nodes have
> participated in a paxos repair? T
