Hi everyone,
Joey has helpfully arranged a call for tomorrow at 8am PST / 10am CST / 4pm BST
to discuss Accord and other things in the community. There are no plans to make
any kind of project decisions. Everyone is welcome to drop in to discuss Accord
or whatever else might be on your mind.
h
No, I would expect to deliver strict serializable interactive transactions
using Accord. These would simply corroborate that the participating keys had
not modified their write timestamps during the final transaction. These could
even be undertaken with still only a single wide area round-trip,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:56 AM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> Could you explain why you believe this trade-off is necessary? We can
> support full SQL just fine with Accord, and I hope that we eventually do so.
>
I assume this is really referring to interactive transactions = multiple
round trips
I feel like I should volunteer to write about MongoDB transactions.
TL;DR Snapshot Isolation and Causal Consistency using Raft'ish, Lamport
clock and 2PC. This leads to the age old discussion whether users really
want serializability or not.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:44 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
FWIW I retract this – looking again at the blog post I don’t see adequate
reason to infer they are using a leaderless approach. On balance I expect Fauna
is still using a stable leader. Do you have reason to believe they are now
leaderless?
From: bened...@apache.org
Date: Wednesday, 22 Septemb
Sure, that works for me.
From: Patrick McFadin
Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2021 at 04:47
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions
I would be happy to host a Zoom as I've done in the past. I can post a
transcript and the recording after the call.
